My gut tells me this law is UTTERLY and COMPLETELY illegal; i.e. unconstitutional on it's face.
I mean how in the Hell can anyone meaningfully "dissent" to "petition the gov't for redress of
grievances" if the Gov't lives in a fucking sound-proof Bubble (see Bill Maher)?
But then, look at the courts these daze, esp. SCOTUS = tools of the 1% until Obama appoints
someone with a shred of sense and self-respect. But in the meanwhile, all bets are off really.
The "Armed and dangerous" psychopaths and lunatics REALLY ARE in charge now.
Would that they were more the garden variety psychopath, as they can often be actually quite
brilliant and gifted "commoners" in their own unique ways, sometimes even rare gems of
humanity and compassion.
But not these filthy-rich over-weened over-reaching rat-bastards (To borrow from Mike Malloy)
They truly are vermin masquerading as human; but I can't really say that either, without getting
caught up in the Dehumanization Game of Oppositional Politics, recycling the toxic "US v. THEM"
meme.
Who says politics MUST be "oppositional" .. I never noticed anything in the constitution insisting
that we must be "hateful and oppositional" in how we run the nation. Am I missing something?
Edit history
= new reply since forum marked as read