Hillary's hand picked it company let the database get hacked twice. Why do they still have the job?

[sadoldgirl]

33. May be I have become a cynic about some

ways in which politicians deal with elections,but some
issues come to mind.

1) HRC tried the same kind of trick on Obama in 08, was
caught, and due to party unity it was hushed up.

2) DWS was heavily involved in that election for HRC,
in other words a very strong supporter.

3) The higher-ups of the IT corp.(owners or vice president or
Pagliani) are all strong supporters of the Clinton campaign.

4) In spite of a number of DNC members' agreement to
either more debates or no exclusivity rule DWS made
that decision without large consent.

Considering that Obama was a well established member
of the party he had some protection from the establishment.

Bernie is not in the same position, but I think he knows
how dirt can and could be spread.Thus, if he is demanding
an independent investigation, he may know more about the
set-up than he is willing to talk about. Hence the lawsuit.

I have seen no reason up to now to distrust him, and so
I hope this investigation will be done speedily.

Still, his staffers made big mistakes, and he took the correct
action by firing them. Now let the sunshine in on the rest.