Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Loretta Lynch could file federal charges against Trump for High Treason NOW! [View all]cjbgreen
(181 posts)39. grand jury
I'm not an attorney but it seems as though the information and evidence should involve a grand jury. At the very least the phone calls to Russia after the sanctions seem to be fall into the category of treason.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Loretta Lynch could file federal charges against Trump for High Treason NOW! [View all]
ElementaryPenguin
Jan 2017
OP
What I'm interested in is finding any - even out of the box solutions
ElementaryPenguin
Jan 2017
#36
Than you should clearly understand that POTUS' surrogate to SCOTUS is the Soliciter General...
longship
Jan 2017
#37
Don't worry, LS - I will likely not get to be POTUS to try out my hypothesis,
ElementaryPenguin
Jan 2017
#41
She was Comey's boss. She could have told him not to release the "new" info on Clinton's emails.
jalan48
Jan 2017
#14
You might want to read the 20th Amendment to the US Consitution, it disagrees with you
Lurks Often
Jan 2017
#23
Lurks, I just read it - thank you. This is a very convoluted argument, but
ElementaryPenguin
Jan 2017
#25
No. The House only chooses if the President-elect dies and there is not a Vice-President elect
ElementaryPenguin
Jan 2017
#35
"he would be arrested, and he would not be sworn in as President on Jan. 20th"
PoliticAverse
Jan 2017
#16
There doesn't have to be. The Supreme Court can (AND DOES) rule as they please.
ElementaryPenguin
Jan 2017
#18
I think that the AG position is just ceremonial these days. They have no power.
CentralMass
Jan 2017
#20
This is false.... Put those who are part of the cout on jail before they're put in office
uponit7771
Jan 2017
#51
Any good prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a HAM sandwich. - Sol Wachtler
Brother Buzz
Jan 2017
#50
What are the Constitutional limitations on treason charges? Just interested. nt
JCanete
Jan 2017
#64