Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Every Dem in the Senate and House should have stood with Rep. Waters in not accepting the results... [View all]IphengeniaBlumgarten
(328 posts)8. This may be a feel-good thing to do but we really need to put our energies elsewhere.
No way are these gestures going to accomplish anything. The Republicans have the majority and only they can rid of us of Trump and they will not do so until (1) he becomes a danger to their party and their agenda and (2) he beings to lose the devotion of at least some of his Deplorables.
Until the Republicans recognize that he is too much or an embarrassment or liability to them, we are stuck with him.
Our energy should be spent on pushing back on specific problems, especially where we expect to find broad support, like changes to ACA or medicare or social security; or ethical problems.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Every Dem in the Senate and House should have stood with Rep. Waters in not accepting the results... [View all]
brush
Jan 2017
OP
Thanks for the republican perspective. The intel agencies don't agree with your assessment either.
brush
Jan 2017
#3
The intel agencies did not make an assessment on impact on the elections - that is clearly not their
karynnj
Jan 2017
#14
"Democratic leadership decided early on that it would not support efforts to contest the election."
CrispyQ
Jan 2017
#53
What about cross check where they eliminated voters and all the provisional votes not counted?
kimbutgar
Jan 2017
#6
Anyone who believed that was never going to vote for Clinton no matter what.
former9thward
Jan 2017
#50
This may be a feel-good thing to do but we really need to put our energies elsewhere.
IphengeniaBlumgarten
Jan 2017
#8
A resounding, united protest by the Dems would energize our efforts to fight against trump and . . .
brush
Jan 2017
#9
That's how the senate views itself, gentile and collegial (at least on the Dem side, the repugs, no)
brush
Jan 2017
#23
It would be refreshing to see a Dem pol stand up for something for a change.
Binkie The Clown
Jan 2017
#12
Remember when we were horrified when Trump said he wouldn't accept the election results?
BzaDem
Jan 2017
#20
God! Thanks for the perspective from the other side. Both candidates vowed to accept the results . .
brush
Jan 2017
#28
And I guess the concept of not standing up to interference of a hostile power in our elections...
brush
Jan 2017
#39
If you define "spinelessness" as "accepting reality", it isn't ever going to end.
BzaDem
Jan 2017
#40
Clinton specifically blamed Putin for the wikileaks disclosures during the third debate
onenote
Jan 2017
#37
Absolutely not...I agree that all Dems should have stood with Representative Maxine Waters nt
iluvtennis
Jan 2017
#33
Nixon didn't face arrest until after he resigned. He did face impeachmemt and removal.
BzaDem
Jan 2017
#35
Does anybody here really believe Clinton lost because Podesta's emails were leaked?
snowy owl
Jan 2017
#44