Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: WE Are NOT the Problem [View all]intheflow
(28,950 posts)48. "Superdelegate touting" could fall under "media complicity" in Nance's OP. n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
146 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, precisely the reason Obama said he would have been reelected if allowed to run... and he would have using his tried and true strategies.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#32
Obama probably would have won even if his campaign was run just like Clinton's.
Garrett78
Dec 2016
#33
Obama is a MASTER strategist... he woulda run rings around that Nazi bastard regardless.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#34
I agree, not that Hillary did badly, but, let's be honest, she's no Obama, one of the greatest orators and genuine politicians in our lifetime.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#66
The HRC campaign definitely should have done this. Even her own ads were mostly about Trump. nt
MadDAsHell
Dec 2016
#78
Nance-I volunteer a great deal of my time on voter protection efforts and I would like to know the
Gothmog
Dec 2016
#108
Trump's negatives were higher. If Trump won the candidate with highest negatives won.
delisen
Dec 2016
#52
The primary was essentially over by mid-March and arguably after Super Tuesday.
Garrett78
Dec 2016
#37
Arguably what made it over in March was the hastily declared superdelegate votes...
aikoaiko
Dec 2016
#41
I don't think so at all. The superdelegate count was touted constantly by her surrogates and minions
aikoaiko
Dec 2016
#44
"Superdelegate touting" could fall under "media complicity" in Nance's OP. n/t
intheflow
Dec 2016
#48
And yet, we were beaten about the head and neck with the 'results' and the 'insurmountable lead'
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2016
#82
No, it isn't. You can dig up my posts and the posts of many others making that very point.
Garrett78
Dec 2016
#89
Democrats have always been too reluctant to call out the Republicans for what they are--treasonous
Akamai
Dec 2016
#40
you don't carry out a post-mortem by standing in the morgue going "the patient is SO NOT dead!"
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#100
"Get busy fixing the goddamn boat and quit bitching about who put the fucking holes in it."
The Velveteen Ocelot
Dec 2016
#107
Good post! Here's a little factoid that blows my mind and disgusts me beyond words:
PearliePoo2
Dec 2016
#55
+1, " The problem is gerrymandering, voter suppression, a complicit media, unverifiable vote counts"
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#62
Excellent points, as usual. And one other factor was the candidate who forgot....
George II
Dec 2016
#67
Smells like victory to me! Especially since DWS can speak to "concerned soccer moms"
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#116
Always been on the side of the working class? NAFTA. TPP. Repeal of Glass-Steagall.
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2016
#81
Flat out willfully delusional. See Congress. See State Legislatures. See Governor's Mansions
TheKentuckian
Dec 2016
#109
100% correct - but good luck trying to get some on this board to admit it
Midwestern Democrat
Dec 2016
#136
The gerrymandering has been there since 2011. The Democrats had 5 years to so something about it.
MarkCross7
Dec 2016
#126