Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: WE Are NOT the Problem [View all]Garrett78
(10,721 posts)27. The incumbent re-election rate was even higher than normal this year.
And that's really saying something given how high it typically is.
That includes the re-election of strong proponents of the TPP and opponents of Wall Street reform. Meanwhile, candidates strongly backed by Sanders did worse than Clinton.
This was cultural, not economic. And not really anti-establishment either.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
146 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, precisely the reason Obama said he would have been reelected if allowed to run... and he would have using his tried and true strategies.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#32
Obama probably would have won even if his campaign was run just like Clinton's.
Garrett78
Dec 2016
#33
Obama is a MASTER strategist... he woulda run rings around that Nazi bastard regardless.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#34
I agree, not that Hillary did badly, but, let's be honest, she's no Obama, one of the greatest orators and genuine politicians in our lifetime.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#66
The HRC campaign definitely should have done this. Even her own ads were mostly about Trump. nt
MadDAsHell
Dec 2016
#78
Nance-I volunteer a great deal of my time on voter protection efforts and I would like to know the
Gothmog
Dec 2016
#108
Trump's negatives were higher. If Trump won the candidate with highest negatives won.
delisen
Dec 2016
#52
The primary was essentially over by mid-March and arguably after Super Tuesday.
Garrett78
Dec 2016
#37
Arguably what made it over in March was the hastily declared superdelegate votes...
aikoaiko
Dec 2016
#41
I don't think so at all. The superdelegate count was touted constantly by her surrogates and minions
aikoaiko
Dec 2016
#44
"Superdelegate touting" could fall under "media complicity" in Nance's OP. n/t
intheflow
Dec 2016
#48
And yet, we were beaten about the head and neck with the 'results' and the 'insurmountable lead'
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2016
#82
No, it isn't. You can dig up my posts and the posts of many others making that very point.
Garrett78
Dec 2016
#89
Democrats have always been too reluctant to call out the Republicans for what they are--treasonous
Akamai
Dec 2016
#40
you don't carry out a post-mortem by standing in the morgue going "the patient is SO NOT dead!"
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#100
"Get busy fixing the goddamn boat and quit bitching about who put the fucking holes in it."
The Velveteen Ocelot
Dec 2016
#107
Good post! Here's a little factoid that blows my mind and disgusts me beyond words:
PearliePoo2
Dec 2016
#55
+1, " The problem is gerrymandering, voter suppression, a complicit media, unverifiable vote counts"
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#62
Excellent points, as usual. And one other factor was the candidate who forgot....
George II
Dec 2016
#67
Smells like victory to me! Especially since DWS can speak to "concerned soccer moms"
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#116
Always been on the side of the working class? NAFTA. TPP. Repeal of Glass-Steagall.
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2016
#81
Flat out willfully delusional. See Congress. See State Legislatures. See Governor's Mansions
TheKentuckian
Dec 2016
#109
100% correct - but good luck trying to get some on this board to admit it
Midwestern Democrat
Dec 2016
#136
The gerrymandering has been there since 2011. The Democrats had 5 years to so something about it.
MarkCross7
Dec 2016
#126