2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: A few observations on "progressives" I've noticed from this election [View all]Kentonio
(4,377 posts)His point of disagreement with yours is simply that for you a supporter has to agree on every social issue you do or else they are the enemy. To him he'd rather win the votes of people who share his belief in protecting the most vulnerable in society, even if they can't agree on certain issues such as abortion. That doesn't mean he's going to stop fighting for it, and it certainly doesn't mean he dismisses it in any way, but it doesn't have to be the kind of purity test that you guys appear to be so fond of currently.
We saw this 'with us or against us' mentality here constantly during the primary and then general. We apparently didn't need the votes of anyone who didn't conform 100% to the ideal. Well guess what, your purity test way of thinking just handed government to the party who want to completely strip women of their reproductive rights. Way to go..