Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
1. Here is what strategy was bad....
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 10:15 AM
Dec 2016

The strategy of putting money and time and effort and resources into states like Arizona and Iowa and Georgia, or even solidly blue states like my own state of New Jersey. Resources that could have been better spent in "swing" states that we lost by razor thin margins.

That is it. That is the beginning and the end of what went wrong this election. In short, assumptions and hubris did us in.

We won the popular vote by a lot.

We only lost those "must win" states by a ridiculously small margin. A margin small enough that some really solid GOTV could have shifted things in the opposite direction.

That was the only strategy that was bad this election. And like it or not that responsibility falls firmly within the Clinton camp. Not her directly as I would assume that is not something she herself would be in charge of, but still the responsibility of her staff and the people she hired and the people she charged with one job and one job only, and that is winning the election.

Everything else, every other discussion is nothing more than small details around the margins.

We don't need a major overhaul. We don't need to discuss purity or compromise. We need to discuss the proper allocation of resources and the need to do a full court press every election in every location. That is it. That is the area that we failed on.

There's the other issue of how complacent and lazy we get in between presidential campaigns and the fact that we focus myopically on the White House at the expense of everything else, but that is for a different discussion.

Here is what strategy was bad.... vi5 Dec 2016 #1
I agree that the pop vote lead proves that most people agree with the liberal platform.. JHan Dec 2016 #2
Obama needed to be a better salesman.... vi5 Dec 2016 #5
but in fact her 50 state strategy was in part to expand the base and was planned Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #4
Well obviously that didn't happen either... vi5 Dec 2016 #6
Fair enough. But did you read the piece? Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #7
I more or less agree with it.... vi5 Dec 2016 #8
She spent a lot of time and resources in Pennsylvania oberliner Dec 2016 #14
this piece actually is the perfect encapsulization of what I've been arguing for months Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #3
I've no problem calling it out as stupid as well.. JHan Dec 2016 #9
The article sets up a straw-man by suggesting that Sanders thinks we should refocus JCanete Dec 2016 #10
It doesn't matter who or how or what brought her more to the left, she was on the left. JHan Dec 2016 #11
The article proves that we are clueless. Take on the fucking media already. Some small percentage of JCanete Dec 2016 #12
I prove I have empathy by voting to help pass policies that benefit them... JHan Dec 2016 #13
No, the people don't know the media is corporatist. We don't tell them. They think the media has JCanete Dec 2016 #15
I don't know how to counter the misinformation: JHan Dec 2016 #16
There is nothing I disagree with really about what you just said. The very sad fact about JCanete Dec 2016 #17
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»On Progressive Politics: ...»Reply #1