Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

planetc

(8,251 posts)
Sat Dec 17, 2016, 10:14 AM Dec 2016

Why is it so difficult for us to think the election was stolen? [View all]

We have: the Russian theory, the weak candidate theory, the sexism theory, the candidate's unbalanced message theory, the candidate's lack of pizzazz theory. We have theories out the kazoo to explain an election result that surprised *everybody*. Why is it so difficult to think, even for a moment, that somebody just stole the election? This time, it was not just the exit polls, but most of the opinion polls before the election. Nate Silver miscalled the election??? What if Nate, and the other poll readers, and the exit pollers all called the voters' intentions and actions RIGHT? Mr. Trump's victory hangs on razor thin margins in three (or more) states. Is electoral college arithmetic difficult? It can be mastered if you can add and subtract. Is it difficult to hack an optical scanner? It's easy. What is riding on the outcome of this election? An awful lot of tax payer money. Do we think our political opponents are such principled people and so scrupulous of our voting rights (stop laughing! ) that they*would never do such a thing*??? Republicans spend half their time between elections trying to minimize Democratic votes in the next election. By vote suppression measures of all kinds. Do we imagine that when voting day finally arrives, they cease all nefarious action and do their best to count every vote, including Democratic votes? What are we, crazy? In April of this year, Congressional Republicans refused to consider Pres. Obama's candidate for the Supreme Court vacancy until after the election. Mere recalcitrance? Or did they know the fix was in?

Dr. Stein's efforts to get recounts, or audits, or any confirmation at all of the accuracy of the announced vote totals were met by vigorous resistance from Republican lawyers, and those failed efforts made one thing clear. We CAN'T get a meaningful recount because of a maze of state laws, the Bush v. Gore decision, the antiquity of some voting machines, and the colossal expense of hand recounting ballots. Only a few blessed states could have responded adequately to a request for a recount because only a few are using paper ballots hand counted. ONLY those few states could have said: "Sure, it'll take us about a week." We are left to conclude, if we are honest, that our presidential elections are unverifiable. We have just spent 18 months of our lives spending hundreds of millions of dollars on campaigning, and often hanging on the results of every opinion poll that came out, and we CAN'T be sure of who was elected? Or, in other words, are we crazy?

Forget the Russians, who certainly seem to have played a role in yet more anti-Clinton propaganda. Why look at the Kremlin's hackers when we have perfectly competent hackers at home?

Please, I beg of you, stop whipping yourselves for one moment, and think aloud: "But what if they just stole it? Again?"

66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I pretty much figured it was being stolen Richard D Dec 2016 #1
Yes, I found that suspicious too! Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #2
esp. the nature of that hack CountAllVotes Dec 2016 #11
The "God Emperor Trump" Richard D Dec 2016 #24
I thought the faces w/the red lips on them CountAllVotes Dec 2016 #46
Coinkidink??... I don't think so!! InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2016 #13
It was stolen by calculating just where and how many votes to swing the electoral college brush Dec 2016 #29
I thought that too blue cat Dec 2016 #33
the comradery helps triron Dec 2016 #34
+1 uponit7771 Dec 2016 #42
me too! Really it started for me the day before, when Trump was announcing Cabinet picks. nt LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #65
it was stolen. putitinD Dec 2016 #3
Well, that's four of us. So far, so good. eom planetc Dec 2016 #4
It was stolen. Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #5
They stole it. True_Blue Dec 2016 #6
It is very easy to think and to see. Coyotl Dec 2016 #8
Worth a thousand words triron Dec 2016 #19
This. All the GOP cares about is money and power. Look at what they do in the light of day: NC coup chimpymustgo Dec 2016 #47
mine is zippythepinhead Dec 2016 #62
Cynic alert: Frankly, I think EVERYONE in politics... Guilded Lilly Dec 2016 #7
Never any need to apologize for cynicism ... planetc Dec 2016 #16
We just don't want it to be true CanonRay Dec 2016 #9
It was absolutely stolen. onecaliberal Dec 2016 #10
Stolen elections require an entirely different post mortem Kotya Dec 2016 #12
You're right. planetc Dec 2016 #14
Yes you are right on (see my other post here- triron Dec 2016 #18
+1 uponit7771 Dec 2016 #43
We should be used to it by now. 2000, anyone? nt Laffy Kat Dec 2016 #15
Also see Prof. Ron Baiman's triron Dec 2016 #17
No question in my mind it was stolen!! ElementaryPenguin Dec 2016 #20
I believe it is 24 out of 28 triron Dec 2016 #22
I just cut and pasted it from the report... ElementaryPenguin Dec 2016 #23
Another important numerical statistic triron Dec 2016 #26
It was absolutely stolen, and we will, I fear, end up doing nothing but watch our 60 years plus Grey Lemercier Dec 2016 #21
Yes, I think it was. Some of it we have proof of, like.. mvd Dec 2016 #25
Good points. For all we know, all the outrage over the Russians mtnsnake Dec 2016 #27
Yeah, it strikes me that the Russians are a distraction from horrendous problems in the voting ... planetc Dec 2016 #31
I do fear this. It's a horrible charade that has become really dangerous for the non-1%. chimpymustgo Dec 2016 #48
they stole it it so many ways KT2000 Dec 2016 #28
Also the bashing last year and this year. planetc Dec 2016 #49
For one thing, there's no evidence for that theory mythology Dec 2016 #30
Why is it so difficult for us to think the election was stolen? LenaBaby61 Dec 2016 #32
There is two ways to look at it. Exilednight Dec 2016 #35
Also depends on both triron Dec 2016 #36
Statistical evidence is the worst kind of evidence. Exilednight Dec 2016 #37
Then why is it so widely used in the sciences triron Dec 2016 #39
Big difference. Exilednight Dec 2016 #45
The studies of the "red shift" are also done by trained statisticians. planetc Dec 2016 #50
Dr Philips is a doctor of? Exilednight Dec 2016 #51
I urge you to look up Dr. Phillips' book planetc Dec 2016 #57
If we anulled the election, it'd cause a revolt and we'd look like facists. You don't have proof of dionysus Dec 2016 #66
Ron Baiman is a trained statistician. triron Dec 2016 #55
I think it's the whole boy/wolf story. egduj Dec 2016 #38
yes; we need all paper ballots, all hand-counted, all the time. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #40
Of course it was stolen. Our vote was "hacked" in so many ways.... MaeScott Dec 2016 #41
All our elections are stolen, to varying degrees. Orsino Dec 2016 #44
To me the state to look to on this matter is actually Iowa. StevieM Dec 2016 #52
Iowa is just one state triron Dec 2016 #54
I think that polling has taken on a life of its own HoneyBadger Dec 2016 #53
I have no problems with it, clearly 2000 and 2004 were stolen as well. Rex Dec 2016 #56
The 2016 "election." Paladin Dec 2016 #58
I as well triron Dec 2016 #59
Because it makes us complacent and lazy. Kentonio Dec 2016 #60
I agree Iamaartist Dec 2016 #61
Stolen MoonRiver Dec 2016 #63
to anyone who believes this election was not stolen zippythepinhead Dec 2016 #64
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why is it so difficult fo...»Reply #0