Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Just for the sake of discussion what if Bernie was nominated? [View all]Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)148. There is no proof of cheating in WI.
None. Feingold knew there was going to be a problem here and told the Clinton campaign she needed to come here. She didn't. She, and apparently many other right here, did/do not understand how conservative this state is becoming. It is very much a swing state now compared to decades ago. The message that was spread the loudest here was Trump's.
To say that he won here because of cheating is just going to set up WI to be a Republican state in the next major election cycles.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
166 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I did not accuse you or anyone of lying...and have edited the post to make sure that is clear.
Demsrule86
Dec 2016
#55
Really? Why did Russ Feingold and Zypher Teachout lose? Why did every Democrat
still_one
Dec 2016
#97
So is it that the Presidential ticket can or can't affect down ballot votes?
Goblinmonger
Dec 2016
#147
Ah, so that's why Scott walker won multiple times, Paul Ryan, and Johnson, its all Hillary's and
still_one
Dec 2016
#151
Knocking out a sure win? You do realize it wasn't a sure thing, especially based on the results.
Exilednight
Dec 2016
#154
Ok, what *actual evidence* do you have that the opp research on him "was substantial?"
JudyM
Dec 2016
#21
Really? This again? This is all so minimal in comparison to the final candidates.
JudyM
Dec 2016
#26
Still all pales in comparison to the others' issues, not to mention completely offset by far greater
JudyM
Dec 2016
#30
Again, pure conjecture. There were actual problems with Clinton's actions, these were not fabricated
JudyM
Dec 2016
#83
Personally, I believe the email thing, and the DNC's underhandedness in throwing the primary
JudyM
Dec 2016
#89
Looks to me Kurt got all this secret opposition research file from DU. Not repigs. LOL
Hassin Bin Sober
Dec 2016
#96
Yeah point me to a single mainstream publication that had this all over their frontpages.
JHan
Dec 2016
#127
Yeah, at least you admit the smears surfacing on cable are part of her campaign strategy
Hassin Bin Sober
Dec 2016
#158
The Castro/Cuba stuff, the Sandanista stuff, the socialism stuff, the rape letter, the . . .
brush
Dec 2016
#94
no, the ammo on him was huge. just because Clinton didn't take the cheap shots
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#54
Kurt Eichenwald of Newsweek personally viewed the "ammo" and said it was major.
pnwmom
Dec 2016
#104
This isn't an attack on Sanders from me, it's about baggage and how Repubs would frame their attacks
JHan
Dec 2016
#119
He would have won because more Dems would have come out to vote and independents would have
JudyM
Dec 2016
#14
ah, that is why Russ Feingold lost, and every Democrat running for Senate in a swing
still_one
Dec 2016
#98
Goosetep...funny way to describe a primary win that can only be described as massive.
Demsrule86
Dec 2016
#42
"Goose step off to the coronation of Hillary"? Are you sure you and your applauders ....
Hekate
Dec 2016
#46
It is past time for folks to stop hinting that Bernie would have won the election...he wouldn't
Demsrule86
Dec 2016
#32
Actually there is an indication that there was cheating... the article is posted here.
Demsrule86
Dec 2016
#166
no because he is magical. so there would be nothing mean in his emails
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#52
millions on twitter did. and given she lost by about 80,000 votes, i'd say yes.
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#58
Trump voters thought he had integrity? Never heard anyone claim that before.
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#142
Comey, Voter suppression, Russia... !!!! IT WOULD APPLY TO BERNIE ALSO !!! These Questions act as
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#77
Yeah, right... cause they could not just make some shit up hunh?! REALLY?! Come on people
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#79
Ha! No, there was no investigation because there was nothing he did to warrant it.
JudyM
Dec 2016
#80
Again, they would NOT have just made some shit up!? Comey is a fuckin traitor and it doesn't matter
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#82
That is conjecture, again, as opposed to actual investigation into a deeply problematic history.
JudyM
Dec 2016
#84
Comey being a traitor isn't conjecture, again... no wonder the rest of the DNC isn't up in arms
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#88
If dems get into congress and do not put him in jail then yes, don't run any more dem candidates...
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#111
We'd be talking about how badly he did in the General Election and the lost Senate and House seats.
George II
Dec 2016
#120
My guess is Trump would have received the popular vote as well as the electoral vote victory.
LanternWaste
Dec 2016
#123
Then the discussion would have been how he was going to raise everyone's taxes
geek tragedy
Dec 2016
#133
Bernie probably would've had the better message for the general election. The youth
coolbreeze77
Dec 2016
#157