Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: i would like to apologize to the bernie supporters [View all]BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)85. No, it's not "obvious."
Because the "holier than thou" attitude has, does, and will continue to come from Bernie's supporters, not Clinton's. During the primary, they scoffed that anyone besides them could be right about anything. During the convention, they shat on the Democratic event just because Bernie didn't win. And now they're all over the board post-election with ridiculous "Bernie would have won" nonsense that they can only feel, emotionally, but never prove, realistically.
What you wrote:
"But I wouldn't say his supporters deserve an apology."
This is the exact reason Hillary Clinton lost so many possible voters, the fucking entitlement of that statement uniquely sums up the campaign's outlook after the primary.
This is the exact reason Hillary Clinton lost so many possible voters, the fucking entitlement of that statement uniquely sums up the campaign's outlook after the primary.
You're stating that the Clinton "entitlement" of not owing his supporters an apology is what cost her votes, and then you're trying to turn around and claim you're not demanding an apology. Would it be too much to ask for you to make up your mind, maybe?
And Clinton's supporters didn't "reject" Bernie's. There was no "NeverBernie" coalition of the Democratic Primary. Can you say the same about Bernie's side? Nope. His supporters were more than happy to publicly claim how they'd never back her, and to continue fighting the primary even up to Election Day in November. There's a whole site dedicated to them, JackAssRadicals. Maybe you heard of it?
So please, as I have said before to as many Bernie supporters I see running around DU trying to re-write history, stop projecting your issues onto us Clinton supporters. Stop trying to act like your shit doesn't stink.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
188 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
On "supporters:" Holding a grudge against populations is the antithesis of effective politics.
Eleanors38
Dec 2016
#5
There aree no "Bernie or Busters here, so please stop hat p ing on it. It reads like sour grapes.
hedda_foil
Dec 2016
#154
Sorry, but I disagree. One only needs to look around this particular forum and...
George II
Dec 2016
#179
Thank you for the factual information - HRC did wonder jump pulling off convention while
Justice
Dec 2016
#184
Post hoc ergo prompter hoc. The go-to fallacy in place of supporting evidence.
LanternWaste
Dec 2016
#141
You're arguing that Clinton lost voters because she didn't apologize that Bernie lost?
BobbyDrake
Dec 2016
#57
I realize bias such as yours forces us to hold others to a higher standard than we hold ourselves
LanternWaste
Dec 2016
#142
As if Sanders wouldn't have been skewered mercilessly. Hillary stayed completely away from . . .
brush
Dec 2016
#101
Of course I read it. After seeing what the repugs did with the non-issue of emails . . .
brush
Dec 2016
#153
Let's be honest here. The issue isn't the actual things that Republicans say, it's how a candidate
Exilednight
Dec 2016
#161
Well you won't get "what is perceived as horrible" from me. There are just too many.....
George II
Dec 2016
#180
'Many', 'some', 'not all', sure is nice not to have to back that smear up with facts or real numbers
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2016
#84
Stating that a candidate's supporters exploited a perceived weakness of his opponent
Maven
Dec 2016
#88
Losing a ton of ground each cycle makes it look like the party needs an overhaul.
hellofromreddit
Dec 2016
#109
What "ton of ground" did we lose this cycle? We gained seats in both Houses AND....
George II
Dec 2016
#112
Without Major changes, the Party will become a 3rd party in a two-party system.
Eleanors38
Dec 2016
#147
Very nice of you. The quicker the past is left to be the past and we move forward all
NRaleighLiberal
Dec 2016
#7
I never had a grudge against anyone, I just wanted to see a democrat in the WH. I liked
RKP5637
Dec 2016
#8
and a lot of it was carried by the same credulous people who thought obama was some pure, far-left,
TheFrenchRazor
Dec 2016
#78
My sentiments exactly. As for the rest of my sentiments, I'll keep 'em to myself as they might....
Tarheel_Dem
Dec 2016
#20
Why would you thank me for that? Seems like it'd be better if Hillary Clinton had won
el_bryanto
Dec 2016
#46
I knew it would be an issue. It's all they had. But I didn't delude myself into thinking
pnwmom
Dec 2016
#23
FBI had the emails since at least early October. They could have checked them all
LisaL
Dec 2016
#100
If a "2 foot thick file of opposition research" on Bernie existed, Hillary and DWS would
TonyPDX
Dec 2016
#34
They stopped running against Sanders in April but Sanders attacked Dems till the convention.
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#64
Sanders had LOTS more "baggage" than Clinton, except we just weren't allowed....
George II
Dec 2016
#119
Excellent point...and here is another good one: What if Wes Clark had been the nominee in 2004?
StevieM
Dec 2016
#158
What utter nonsense. Bernie "supporters" helped push the meme that everything & everyone....
Tarheel_Dem
Dec 2016
#31
I agree..Hillary had more votes in the Democratic primary and the Presidential election...nt
asuhornets
Dec 2016
#39
And now it's like they want to be thanked and praised for their knife in our backs.
BobbyDrake
Dec 2016
#51
True, I though I found something false about the OP... they were scorched Earth post April
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#97
That is true. I also don't think it was just Bernie supporters saying this, and as one, I never
JCanete
Dec 2016
#125
It was the FBI's anti-Hillary people that actually made the problem what it was, not Hillary.
ehrnst
Dec 2016
#68
blah! Sanders was a one-dimensional candidate who stood no chance in the general.
Buzz Clik
Dec 2016
#73
so what do you think the ruskies had on bernie? cuz you know they had something.. nt
TheFrenchRazor
Dec 2016
#76
As a Bernie supporter, I don't think the emails were the issue. Clinton has a long past. It's more
JCanete
Dec 2016
#77
totally true...generated in no small part by 30 years of this same shitty media. nt
JCanete
Dec 2016
#124
How about those self-identified progressives who refused to vote for Hillary, or the media
still_one
Dec 2016
#102
Apologies are not about the recipients. okieinpain is mending wounds that need mending.
hellofromreddit
Dec 2016
#111
Yes, it should have been. Probably would have if not for Bernie's divisive anti-Dem campaign.
DanTex
Dec 2016
#149
There was no "hillary's email problem". It was an attack by Russia upon the United States.
baldguy
Dec 2016
#118
Many thought the email would get her because she's corrupt, evidence would be found.
betsuni
Dec 2016
#122
Your apology is accepted. Yes, we were right - and ridiculed for it - but, I take no pleasure in that. Fuhrer-Elect tRump is a nightmare from which we may never wake up.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#127
I backed Bernie in the primary. He said publicly that America was sick of hearing about the e-mails
Mc Mike
Dec 2016
#140
No need to apologize to me. I put the problem much more on the Corporate Press and
harun
Dec 2016
#145
You are apologizing to Clinton critics about being "right" about a right-wing smear campaign?
RelativelyJones
Dec 2016
#178