Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I think the "it ISN'T about economics" argument is, ultimately, a deeply right wing position. [View all]NRQ891
(217 posts)2. much of Trump's nastiest treatment, was directed toward the other republicans
this election started out with Jeb arriving like he was Junior at the family business. Massive financial war chest, journalistic revisionism of the W Bush era propaganda - a shoe-in.
then there was Ted Cruz, a cynic who had locked up the tea party and Evangelical vote
then there was Marco Rubio, an empty suit trading on a play for the Hispanic vote for the Republican party
there was Rand Paul, inheritor of the pot smoking libertarian conservatives, from his father Ron
and Carly Fiorina, a tech executive who united stockholders and workers in their hate of her
and Trump destroyed them all, mercilessly. Don't underestimate that was part of his appeal, a voting population that was mad at everyone, not just immigrants and muslims. They were angry with the *entire* political establishment, *including* Republicans
I think this point gets overlooked
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think the "it ISN'T about economics" argument is, ultimately, a deeply right wing position. [View all]
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
OP
the re-election of GOP incumbant, was motivated by 'Hillary-Containment' strategy
NRQ891
Dec 2016
#7
The lie itself is an insult. Stats refute your OP..... embarrased to read this BS here.
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#20
Yep. Someone suggested POC would better able to afford the lawyers they needed...
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#19
People who would say those things are idiots and I join you in denouncing them.
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#23
I accept that social oppression is the major part of your economic oppression
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#24
And if I had ever argued that we need to put the fight against bigotry to the side, you'd be right
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#41
So why are you accusing people of putting economic concerns to the side?
forjusticethunders
Dec 2016
#42
Because that's the only explanation for all the threads on how economic issues played no role
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#48
I agree with you on that. Always have. Pretty sure the vast majority of the left actually does.
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#40
Spreading the falsehood that Hillary prioritized social justice over economics is right-wing.
DanTex
Dec 2016
#27
There is ample proof that those who voted for Trump did not care about the economy. Those
Squinch
Dec 2016
#31
Who needs the GOP when Democrats and Liberals sabotage their own platform with GOP talking points..
JHan
Dec 2016
#32
To my mind, those who spew GOP talking points are not Democrats or Liberals. So there's that.
Squinch
Dec 2016
#33
It was a good platform...but in the ads I saw, we didn't talk about it enough.
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#50
I think the 'it ISN'T about racism and sexism" argument is, ultimately, a deeply right wing position
ismnotwasm
Dec 2016
#34
In my life social justice has always been the overriding issue and always will be.
hrmjustin
Dec 2016
#51