Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JHan

(10,173 posts)
52. It is a combination of all those things..
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 05:35 PM
Dec 2016

Depending on how some view Clinton, they'll pick one of the reasons over the other.

And 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 until a slew of posts are made calling those blue collar workers racists NoGoodNamesLeft Dec 2016 #1
that is a bunch of crap dsc Dec 2016 #2
Good luck in 2018 ... 2020 ... 2022 ... portlander23 Dec 2016 #3
then why did Feingold and Strickland lose? dsc Dec 2016 #5
Because Clinton was the top of the ticket portlander23 Dec 2016 #6
she did better than either one of them dsc Dec 2016 #8
The point of the article is illustrated in this conversation portlander23 Dec 2016 #9
well show me some actual evidence that these voters gave a damn about trade dsc Dec 2016 #12
The exit polls portlander23 Dec 2016 #16
No that is plain, flat out, gold carat false dsc Dec 2016 #18
Yep portlander23 Dec 2016 #20
You could bring all the evidence until you're blue in the face.. JHan Dec 2016 #51
She did worse than Obama among voters earning less than 50k. Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #55
No... SidDithers Dec 2016 #24
NO THIS IS NOT TRUE AT ALL JI7 Dec 2016 #39
Bingo. Trumpers voted for establishment GOP candidates radius777 Dec 2016 #49
the pro trade candidates did the best . better than trump. while anti trade dens did worst. worse JI7 Dec 2016 #40
Yep. stopbush Dec 2016 #11
Been saying it for years zipplewrath Dec 2016 #4
We need house and senate candidates to boldly say: PatsFan87 Dec 2016 #7
+1 portlander23 Dec 2016 #10
yeah it is a real winning message for Asians dsc Dec 2016 #13
Clearly a modern, updated version. PatsFan87 Dec 2016 #15
the fact is the New Deal worked dsc Dec 2016 #17
We're into parody at this point portlander23 Dec 2016 #19
I am not saying economic justice has to have racism to exist dsc Dec 2016 #21
Clinton lost voters Obama won in 2012 and 2008 portlander23 Dec 2016 #23
Where are the Democratic leaders going into these communities? PatsFan87 Dec 2016 #32
Beshear won the area dsc Dec 2016 #45
Welcome to DU... SidDithers Dec 2016 #25
Exactly. The FDR party was a Dixiecrat party, radius777 Dec 2016 #50
Yes. And ignore the race-baiters who want to denigrate FDR. hueymahl Dec 2016 #28
this mike_c Dec 2016 #59
First they have to show an interest in the process WhiteTara Dec 2016 #14
I think it's the opposite. I think the left has to stop pointing at Clinton's loss kcr Dec 2016 #22
Progressives that want economic justice are not racists portlander23 Dec 2016 #26
Ok. Keep banging that drum. kcr Dec 2016 #29
Yes, the real losers of this election are exactly those people hueymahl Dec 2016 #33
According to the exit poll portlander23 Dec 2016 #34
Good post hueymahl Dec 2016 #31
Race is a real issue portlander23 Dec 2016 #35
Absolutely. hueymahl Dec 2016 #38
You lost me at "third way" mcar Dec 2016 #66
She opposed single payer, wanted a no fly zone where Russian planes were flying jfern Dec 2016 #78
I'll stop "smearing the party's nose in it" when the party... mike_c Dec 2016 #60
Blue collar workers are decreasing in number while white collar workers are increasing. LonePirate Dec 2016 #27
Sigh Me. Dec 2016 #30
What is wrong with adding economic justice to the platform? portlander23 Dec 2016 #36
Nothing Is Wrong With It Me. Dec 2016 #42
Saying we need economic justice portlander23 Dec 2016 #43
Due Respect Me. Dec 2016 #44
It is a combination of all those things.. JHan Dec 2016 #52
"While voters lost their homes, bankers kept their bonuses." Dems to Win Dec 2016 #37
Youth, yes. Organized labor, yes. Rural Dem outreach, yes. But enough with the WCW narrative. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #41
Yes, the platform was eminently better however... MaeScott Dec 2016 #46
Many people see immigration as an economic issue Dems to Win Dec 2016 #47
I don't get it...Obama was once referred to as "Deporter In Chief" JHan Dec 2016 #53
Numbers. 400,000 deported per year, millions remain in the country Dems to Win Dec 2016 #58
Let's remember our core values: JHan Dec 2016 #61
Yep, no human being is illegal. And it's right wing policies that lead to mass migrations. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #62
Core values include living wage jobs for working class Americans Dems to Win Dec 2016 #67
"tolerating illegal immigration".. JHan Dec 2016 #70
I'll add to that: Garrett78 Dec 2016 #73
thanks for those links Garrett... JHan Dec 2016 #74
When people's lived experiences conflict with economic studies, they believe their own eyes Dems to Win Dec 2016 #75
Yes people believe lots of things.. JHan Dec 2016 #76
It is an economic issue. Do away with undocumented workers and the US economy would collapse. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #63
In this 'uncollapsed' economy, half of Americans can't meet an unexpected $400 expense Dems to Win Dec 2016 #65
Fresh young leaders are important Dems to Win Dec 2016 #48
I disagee. The "Young Leaders" need to work their way up the latter jus like everyone else. n/t Lil Missy Dec 2016 #54
It sounds like you're saying they should pull themselves up by their bootstraps? OhioBlue Dec 2016 #68
Then we agree! Lil Missy Dec 2016 #72
aw heck - I left one word out and after re-reading it completely OhioBlue Dec 2016 #77
My advice? You and the author of this tripe should get over yourselves. n/t Tarheel_Dem Dec 2016 #56
For years I saw many people, including pundits and people on this very board, claiming Exilednight Dec 2016 #57
exactly. n/t OhioBlue Dec 2016 #69
I keep hearing this. But.... Adrahil Dec 2016 #64
Sum up Hillary's economic plan in 3 to 5 words. Exilednight Dec 2016 #71
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Democrats have to advance...»Reply #52