Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
23. No, I haven't seen any evidence that it was insufficiently enthused Sanders weed people
Sun Dec 4, 2016, 07:50 PM
Dec 2016

that caused HRC to lose the rural rust belt.

Whether DWS's alliance with Sheldon Adelson against the will of 70%+ of the electorate in Florida hurt our chances there is a separate question, to my mind.

The genie is out of the bottle on dope, I think Auggie Dec 2016 #1
My concern is he will usher in the corporate takeover NWCorona Dec 2016 #2
Yeah, that's where I see this going. (n/t) SMC22307 Dec 2016 #6
Trump Tokes...nt SidDithers Dec 2016 #13
The beer and pharmaceutical industries will absolutely love that fucking asshole Sessions mtnsnake Dec 2016 #3
Well, Hillary and Trump were functionally equivalent on the stump, ie "let states decide". Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #4
Nope, people have to be smarter than that, as you can see the end result stevenleser Dec 2016 #7
You seem to be arguing with phantom people who didn't actually vote for Hillary. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #9
Nope, I'm arguing re: people who said there was functionally no difference, like you just did. nt stevenleser Dec 2016 #11
I'm not going to play one of these "bad internet arguments" games, Steve. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #12
And I am saying people have to be smarter than that and use history as a guide. stevenleser Dec 2016 #17
I'm all for people being smarter. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #20
Would you acknowledge that maybe DWS was a real problem for our party in Florida? Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #5
Nope, people not learning from the past was the issue for our party stevenleser Dec 2016 #8
You're having a conversation with yourself, which bears no resemblance to anything I asked. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #10
I know that is your argument, and once again, anyone thinking that way should have known stevenleser Dec 2016 #16
Who do you think I voted for, Steve? Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #18
Why do you insist in thinking this is about you or how I think you voted? This is broader than that. stevenleser Dec 2016 #19
Yes, it's about fighting imaginary battles against "some folks", most of whom aren't even on this Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #21
This entire forum is about that battle and that "DU primary fighting goodness" stevenleser Dec 2016 #22
No, I haven't seen any evidence that it was insufficiently enthused Sanders weed people Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #23
Hillary wasn't perfect on every issue mcar Dec 2016 #14
Yep, and here we are. nt stevenleser Dec 2016 #15
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I heard some folks say Hi...»Reply #23