Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(27,725 posts)
18. The difference between proportionality and those two is gerrymandering
Tue Nov 29, 2016, 06:46 AM
Nov 2016

A larger state that divided electors by Congressional districts would hand more national power to those drawing the lines.

Please note that they're all blue states. hedda_foil Nov 2016 #1
Passed Repub Arizona House (40-16) and Repub Oklahoma Senate (28-18) pat_k Nov 2016 #3
Nebraska and Maine don't do "winner-takes-all" pat_k Nov 2016 #5
The difference between proportionality and those two is gerrymandering FBaggins Nov 2016 #18
Not a fan of this approach MichMan Nov 2016 #2
All this means is the winner of the vote wins the election. No other country has such Maraya1969 Nov 2016 #4
Disagree with the Electoral College if you must... FBaggins Nov 2016 #19
I didn't know that about the Brits. But they are the ancestors of the American Maraya1969 Nov 2016 #20
True... but they're hardly the only example FBaggins Nov 2016 #22
If the compact states were barely 270 votes, the entire system would be unstable and probably fail tritsofme Nov 2016 #6
We have a habit of not thinking ahead on matters like this davidn3600 Nov 2016 #8
The problem is, the "balance" is severely tilted. pat_k Nov 2016 #10
But if you don't like the system, you have to change it. There is a process. davidn3600 Nov 2016 #13
??? pat_k Nov 2016 #9
If the compact states are at 270 or just barely over, it would be incredibly unstable and vulnerable tritsofme Nov 2016 #12
It is not actually enacted as a "compact"... pat_k Nov 2016 #14
Then we should never pass a law marylandblue Nov 2016 #15
The last time a republican won the popular vote was Bush 2004. It is probably not Maraya1969 Nov 2016 #21
Many constitutional scholors have suggested this is unconstitutional davidn3600 Nov 2016 #7
Passed Repub Arizona House (40-16) and Repub Oklahoma Senate (28-18) pat_k Nov 2016 #11
P.S. pat_k Nov 2016 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author jfern Nov 2016 #17
This proposal ends up being as odd as the electoral college. IphengeniaBlumgarten Nov 2016 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»National Popular Vote Int...»Reply #18