Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

radius777

(3,814 posts)
108. Palmer is pro-Hillary/Obama and dislikes the alt-left/berniebots,
Sun Nov 27, 2016, 05:13 PM
Nov 2016

so to the extent that he does get drubbed by those people, makes him a hero in my book.

I've read his articles for the past six months or so, and there is nothing factually untrue in his articles, which are click-baity, but that is normal (even for establishment publications) in this day and age.

Explains why I'm not good with numbers HassleCat Nov 2016 #1
It will be interesting to see what happens when the dust settles. AgadorSparticus Nov 2016 #2
Indeed, it's all fun and games until the truth is revealed Snarkoleptic Nov 2016 #3
Exactly!! It was mentioned somewhere else how we are blatently ignoring this AgadorSparticus Nov 2016 #7
The Republican FBI keithbvadu2 Nov 2016 #63
So outrageous. AgadorSparticus Nov 2016 #103
Same here. NWCorona Nov 2016 #12
does anyone know how much credibility Bill Palmer has? spooky3 Nov 2016 #4
He posted here in April oberliner Nov 2016 #9
Thank you. spooky3 Nov 2016 #19
Here are some people who like him and info he posts about himself - sounds good to me womanofthehills Nov 2016 #10
Bill Palmer?? benld74 Nov 2016 #5
This is a BS clickbait website - not an actual news source oberliner Nov 2016 #6
Isn't Palmer the one SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #8
Palmer is credible. These "errors" all just happened to be in favor of Trump radius777 Nov 2016 #27
Palmer's math certainly isn't credible SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #35
So here you are again taking the other Party's side rusty fender Nov 2016 #73
Does seem to be the pattern. Bobbie Jo Nov 2016 #74
Yes rusty fender Nov 2016 #75
Yes SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #87
LOL! You have so overplayed your hand. Squinch Nov 2016 #91
Still waiting SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #95
Here you go: You have overplayed your hand in a comical way. Squinch Nov 2016 #98
Still nothing I see SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #100
Good for you! Bobbie Jo Nov 2016 #94
LOL n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #96
How am I taking the other party's side? n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #76
It's getting a little old... FBaggins Nov 2016 #80
Yep SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #89
Here is Steve Schale's article SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #86
LOL! Gosh, look who's here trying to dissuade people from doing a recount! What a surprise. Squinch Nov 2016 #90
Not trying to dissuade anyone from doing a recount SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #93
Sure you aren't. That's why you go into every thread and try to dissuade people from supporting Squinch Nov 2016 #97
I haven't tried to dissuade anyone SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #99
Sure you haven't tried to dissuade anyone. Except for all the times in every thread on the subject Squinch Nov 2016 #101
Thinking something is a waste of time SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #102
You are so insistent, and so ever present in all these threads, dissuading people from Squinch Nov 2016 #104
Do you even know what the word dissuade means? SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #105
Lol! Tell us again how we shouldn't support the recounts, though you don't really care Squinch Nov 2016 #107
So why are the Party leaders remaining silent and not pursuing recounts (until Stein prevailed?) Texin Nov 2016 #53
because Democrats have no stones, radius777 Nov 2016 #54
Like when they fought the Florida election fraud? That Guy 888 Nov 2016 #70
Palmer was in another thread here and getting pretty well drubbed ificandream Nov 2016 #67
Palmer is pro-Hillary/Obama and dislikes the alt-left/berniebots, radius777 Nov 2016 #108
But ... ificandream Nov 2016 #109
Exactly forthemiddle Nov 2016 #55
Thank you. nt babylonsister Nov 2016 #13
The data he links to is from Cook Political Report, which is credible. Snarkoleptic Nov 2016 #15
If the overvotes all favor Trump, that's a problem. ucrdem Nov 2016 #14
They weren't overvotes SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #16
Yes I'm sure it was all just a big misunderstanding. nt ucrdem Nov 2016 #20
Yes I'm sure you've never been an election official SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #22
Is this the new meme by the anti-Clinton/Obama alt-left, radius777 Nov 2016 #28
1 uponit7771 Nov 2016 #31
Nope SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #36
Wow! Thank you. chknltl Nov 2016 #50
Yep. Squinch Nov 2016 #92
Please. Cheviteau Nov 2016 #39
Why is it these mistakes kacekwl Nov 2016 #48
They don't always favor Republicans SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #49
Ah, the Daily News Bin dude... demmiblue Nov 2016 #34
Be Advised? Cheviteau Nov 2016 #37
Just letting people know about the site oberliner Nov 2016 #38
Thanks. Cheviteau Nov 2016 #40
Sounds good oberliner Nov 2016 #43
It looks like some of the overvotes observed earlier had been added to Trump's totals ucrdem Nov 2016 #11
Snopes has the current margin at 22,177 votes, after...ah..corrections. Tactical Peek Nov 2016 #17
Sure does ailsagirl Nov 2016 #23
Thanks! 2naSalit Nov 2016 #44
Wisconsin and past voting irregularities - womanofthehills Nov 2016 #18
This time it was only 85.36% ucrdem Nov 2016 #24
Australia has compulsory voting and their turnout is 95% womanofthehills Nov 2016 #52
This is not an anomaly forthemiddle Nov 2016 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author ailsagirl Nov 2016 #21
Kick Hekate Nov 2016 #25
22,000 is a big hump to get over in a recount. RandySF Nov 2016 #26
Yeah? Cheviteau Nov 2016 #42
Only if the tally is now without further "irregularities" are our prospects dim DFW Nov 2016 #45
the larger point is about election fraud radius777 Nov 2016 #51
Recounts typically do find errors davidn3600 Nov 2016 #60
1,000,000 and then some! anamandujano Nov 2016 #79
5K before beginning is extraordinary. 5 will get you 10 there are thousands more. anamandujano Nov 2016 #78
Arithmetic Error? DallasNE Nov 2016 #29
need a miracle demtenjeep Nov 2016 #30
KnR Hugin Nov 2016 #32
i'm shocked... not. nt TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #33
Yes, but Action Nov 2016 #41
If this election has taught us anything it's that... PinkFloyd Nov 2016 #58
Remember, Trump supporters have guns and have threatened to use them if they don't win. alfredo Nov 2016 #62
This message was self-deleted by its author PinkFloyd Nov 2016 #106
Franken vs Coleman JonLP24 Nov 2016 #85
Failure or not it will be successful in bringing attention and for that alone Ligyron Nov 2016 #46
Indeed, I chipped in a few dollars as well. Snarkoleptic Nov 2016 #47
K&R...Thanks for posting red dog 1 Nov 2016 #56
God Himself could announce Trump's shrinking lead... Beartracks Nov 2016 #59
The voters in 2017 should decide the next president bucolic_frolic Nov 2016 #61
K and R. Strike a blow for Democracy in America. oasis Nov 2016 #64
REC #100 ffr Nov 2016 #65
Not a good source ificandream Nov 2016 #66
The Cook Political Report is an exceptional source FBaggins Nov 2016 #77
who's rigging who? barbtries Nov 2016 #68
This may help sort that out... Snarkoleptic Nov 2016 #69
Gotta stop using that fake news crap... ificandream Nov 2016 #71
Who appointed you arbiter of 'fake news' crap'? Snarkoleptic Nov 2016 #88
My wisdom ... ificandream Nov 2016 #110
So as a journo, your skill set may be employed by backing up your claims. Snarkoleptic Nov 2016 #111
Not at all... ificandream Nov 2016 #112
thank you. barbtries Nov 2016 #72
Well stated. anamandujano Nov 2016 #81
Yep, I can't take 60 out of an ATM without rock solid accounting Snarkoleptic Nov 2016 #83
Using Dr. Fitrakis data triron Nov 2016 #82
This is completely normal JonLP24 Nov 2016 #84
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Ahead of recount, Wiscons...»Reply #108