Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

MineralMan

(147,467 posts)
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 10:08 AM Nov 2016

If you fought against Hillary Clinton after the Democratic convention, [View all]

I will remember you. If you begin to complain about what Trump is doing after January 20, I'll remember your attacks on the Democratic nominee. I may remind you of them from time to time. In that regard, I'm a lot like Anonymous. I do not forget. I know, too, that I am not alone in having an excellent memory.

You may have privilege enough to weather the storm created by the Trump administration. I don't know. But, for so many people, there is no privilege that will carry them through a disastrous time. They will remember, too, those who attacked the Democratic nominee and then failed to vote for a Presidential candidate or for a third party candidate in one of the states where that led to a Trump win.

We will remember. We will remind you. Count on it.

Just saying...

186 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I strongly disagree with any Democrat who fought against Hillary after the convention mtnsnake Nov 2016 #1
Each person will do as he or she thinks best, I'm sure. MineralMan Nov 2016 #2
Each person that didn't vote for Hillary: helped put a fascist in office: Just like Nader lewebley3 Nov 2016 #79
Actually is wasn't Nader, it was the 308,000 Florida Dems who voted Bush Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #114
It was Nader and the SCOTUS Raastan Nov 2016 #119
Each one of those voters controlled only one vote -- their own. pnwmom Nov 2016 #149
No doubt, but as a reluctant supporter of Hillary - but supporter nonetheless - after she won the nomination, I don't think it's a good idea to alienate those who may not have done so... InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2016 #129
I will join the OP in remembering. musicblind Nov 2016 #83
this post is way out there. Calling people monsters who do vote on principle, like JCanete Nov 2016 #89
Yeah it is OTT. OTOH they had an opportunity to vote for the only candidate who could stop Trump. emulatorloo Nov 2016 #96
Tell that to all the undocumented minorities whose parents brought them to the US as babies NoGoodNamesLeft Nov 2016 #97
by that logic, tell anybody from Iraq that the people who voted for Hillary, including myself, JCanete Nov 2016 #98
By your logic every person who did NOT vote for Hillary is responsible for the dead kids in Aleppo NoGoodNamesLeft Nov 2016 #100
so we're on the on the same page. Calling people monsters for voting their conscience, no matter how JCanete Nov 2016 #101
I didn't call anyone monsters...but the BOBs and Stein voters may as well have voted for Trump IMO NoGoodNamesLeft Nov 2016 #102
and with that kind of break-down, we can most certainly never come back from it. JCanete Nov 2016 #106
You should not assume things... NoGoodNamesLeft Nov 2016 #107
Let me make it clear because you're right about one thing, I was not sensitive to JCanete Nov 2016 #109
I think what many people fail to understand is that Trump being elected genuinely HURTS many people NoGoodNamesLeft Nov 2016 #111
Well take me. I did vote for Hillary. But actually count me as someone JCanete Nov 2016 #113
I'm just frustrated with people on here claiming Bernie would have won when he would NOT have NoGoodNamesLeft Nov 2016 #120
I will admit that my post was harsh and that I could have said that in a better way. musicblind Nov 2016 #117
Thanks for your reply, and I feel like I've been unfairly demanding of a lot of people who are JCanete Nov 2016 #118
Very well said NoGoodNamesLeft Nov 2016 #121
Besides, blaming Nader defies the evidence. alarimer Nov 2016 #138
Please give up the Nader denialism. It's amazing that Nader supporters redstateblues Nov 2016 #178
Post removed Post removed Nov 2016 #3
And if you think Bernie wasn't a weak general election candidate, I have a nice bridge for sale. LisaL Nov 2016 #4
All polls showed Bernie was easily the strongest candidate from either party. cpwm17 Nov 2016 #5
Yeah! Polls! LOL! Madam45for2923 Nov 2016 #9
Hillary was the weakest among the Democrats, according to the polls. cpwm17 Nov 2016 #18
Polls again!? Polls the wiener of 2016!!! Madam45for2923 Nov 2016 #25
All the polls I saw showed Hillary winning right up to election day world wide wally Nov 2016 #50
You can't base it on polls that don't reflect the opposition they had against him for fuck's sake. JTFrog Nov 2016 #12
His visit with the pope... Blanks Nov 2016 #68
Essay Lotusflower70 Nov 2016 #104
You are just making Eichenwald's point. JTFrog Nov 2016 #108
Explanation Lotusflower70 Nov 2016 #110
oops, wrong place JCanete Nov 2016 #115
well in a season of "grab them by the pussy", at worst an essay would have been a wash. JCanete Nov 2016 #116
Bernie could never win because he's too far left for moderate Independents NoGoodNamesLeft Nov 2016 #13
Because all those PoC that rejected Bernie... SaschaHM Nov 2016 #15
Unvetted Bernie perhaps mcar Nov 2016 #37
For Someone Who Was Never Properly Vetted otohara Nov 2016 #74
That must be why he won then . . . oh wait . . . Maru Kitteh Nov 2016 #93
Take a look at Kurt Eichenwald's postmortem when you get a chance emulatorloo Nov 2016 #99
Eichenwald dispelled this myth BainsBane Nov 2016 #150
Those polls were way beyond the margin of error, too. JudyM Nov 2016 #174
Yes. He was a weak primary candidate too--he lost by millions of votes, and many states he "won" MADem Nov 2016 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author INdemo Nov 2016 #184
I'm not addressing the primary race at all. MineralMan Nov 2016 #7
Post removed Post removed Nov 2016 #17
Hmm...perhaps. MineralMan Nov 2016 #20
Nope, ain't gonna work dude. lapucelle Nov 2016 #42
We have enough problems with the right calling progressives communists, to also Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #6
The problems we WILL have will be with an unqualified Republican MineralMan Nov 2016 #8
My mistake. Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #10
Read my words. I used the words "fought against," MineralMan Nov 2016 #11
Does the difference between forget and forgive really matter? Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #14
There is an enormous difference in meaning between those MineralMan Nov 2016 #16
You have a right to your opinions. Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #19
I've been aware of the Green Party for decades now. MineralMan Nov 2016 #21
Maybe Stein is looking back at history and realizing that Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #24
My concern for Jill Stein runs about one molecule deep. MineralMan Nov 2016 #27
The Green Party comes around every 4 years and has cost the Democrats the presidential asuhornets Nov 2016 #35
The saddest part of the "Nader effect" is that is also soils Bernie Sanders NoGoodNamesLeft Nov 2016 #55
I am right there with you radical noodle Nov 2016 #65
And I stated them carefully and seriously. MineralMan Nov 2016 #22
Make a difference? heaven05 Nov 2016 #54
Post removed Post removed Nov 2016 #23
I guess Bye? Madam45for2923 Nov 2016 #26
Shoot. I missed it... MineralMan Nov 2016 #28
She will garner more than 3 million votes more than Trump. Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #29
I think 2 million of us in heavily Dems States should spread to the Red States Madam45for2923 Nov 2016 #32
Wake up call. Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #34
K&R stonecutter357 Nov 2016 #30
Yes, they can't be trusted and if they didn't vote for Hillary they are not welcome here. n/t seaglass Nov 2016 #33
Short-sighted and foolish... sfwriter Nov 2016 #105
Take it up with Skinner - the price of admission to DU is a vote for Hillary or support for her seaglass Nov 2016 #169
Right there with you MM mcar Nov 2016 #36
The problem does not sit with those who actively fought against Clinton. Buzz Clik Nov 2016 #38
I disagree. Those who actively fought influenced others as well. MineralMan Nov 2016 #39
There's more worth remembering that just that FBaggins Nov 2016 #40
Nonsense. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #43
Welcome to DU! FBaggins Nov 2016 #49
Not new but you know that... Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #125
Of course... and YOU knew that FBaggins Nov 2016 #136
They had a vote just like the rest of us and once the primary was over and he lost by millions of Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #159
The primary is over Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #127
The election is over too. We lost. FBaggins Nov 2016 #137
I'm so tired of the idea that the primary caused the loss. alarimer Nov 2016 #140
How would we exempt the primary process from evaluating why we lost? FBaggins Nov 2016 #144
You don't get to decide who calls the shots...we all decide. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #158
That's just amusing Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #58
The only people I saw told were not needed were those reposting RW trash against HRC....the ethics bettyellen Nov 2016 #80
Not what I saw or experienced Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #84
And that is worth remembering! KPN Nov 2016 #45
Agreed 100% Arazi Nov 2016 #61
Took 8 weeks and 3 days after the nomination was won... joshcryer Nov 2016 #156
Damned right. JudyM Nov 2016 #175
Yup. ismnotwasm Nov 2016 #41
Post removed Post removed Nov 2016 #44
Nope, wrong heaven05 Nov 2016 #47
Hillary lost by less than 1 point across three states that mattered. LisaL Nov 2016 #48
Guessing doesn't make it true. George Eliot Nov 2016 #51
Guessing that Bernie would have won doesn't make it true either. LisaL Nov 2016 #53
Ah... but his supporters don't have to "delude themselves"... FBaggins Nov 2016 #63
We're well past the point where thwarted entitlement couched as righteous indignation lapucelle Nov 2016 #64
Rofl! Let me see if I've got this straight FBaggins Nov 2016 #71
Sorry, darlin, but I don't live in the simplistic world of false dichotomy lapucelle Nov 2016 #76
Laughter is the only appropriate response to such nonsense. FBaggins Nov 2016 #78
Sanders primary voters voted for Clinton in the general election.. aidbo Nov 2016 #82
This chart doesn't represent votes cast on election day. lapucelle Nov 2016 #87
Nope. ismnotwasm Nov 2016 #59
Actually, no. Had I voted for Sanders, he still wouldn't have gotten MineralMan Nov 2016 #66
Because he would win PA and VA, two states that he lost in the primary? SaschaHM Nov 2016 #75
great post heaven05 Nov 2016 #46
Thank you and I'm glad you have that good memory treestar Nov 2016 #52
I did and held my nose Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #56
Not worth it HassleCat Nov 2016 #57
It won't come up unless those who voted and worked against Clinton MineralMan Nov 2016 #67
Going to be some "told you so!" HassleCat Nov 2016 #81
first of all, do you think anybody on this site thought Trump was going to do good things in office JCanete Nov 2016 #94
KnR Hekate Nov 2016 #60
The Bernie fanatics will have blood on their hands. liquid diamond Nov 2016 #62
They have no conscience. musicblind Nov 2016 #86
And I'll remember all those who said that Hillary couldn't lose. She's the strongest candidate to Exilednight Nov 2016 #69
I think it was said she was the "most qualified candidate", in fact she was the most qualified, Thinkingabout Nov 2016 #72
People on this very board, the OP included, stated in former posts that she was the strongest Exilednight Nov 2016 #73
Which candidate was more qualified? Thinkingabout Nov 2016 #112
Defined "most qualified". I find it to be a subjective term. Exilednight Nov 2016 #139
I got your point, being the most qualified candidate is not a Thinkingabout Nov 2016 #143
It is subjective. Just because someone held a job, it doesn't mean they're qualified. Exilednight Nov 2016 #145
Likewise, Sanders has been in Congress for twenty five years, he is not ranked at the top Thinkingabout Nov 2016 #154
I agree, that ranking you posted is subjective. Exilednight Nov 2016 #157
What did you find Sanders was ranked? Thinkingabout Nov 2016 #161
Depends on your point of view. Exilednight Nov 2016 #162
No, you can't blame his ratings on a Republican Congress, there were other members Thinkingabout Nov 2016 #163
Like I said, Republican controlled Congress. Exilednight Nov 2016 #164
Okay, Sanders performed lower in a Republican than other Democrats. Thinkingabout Nov 2016 #165
Based on whose criteria? it's all subjective. Exilednight Nov 2016 #166
I have provided you the link already. Thinkingabout Nov 2016 #167
A link that proves nothing about someone qualifications. It's just a study to be used to form an Exilednight Nov 2016 #168
No, this link is based on facts, you have only provided your opinion. Thinkingabout Nov 2016 #170
It's a study, nothing more. it offers no actual conclusions that determines a person's qualification Exilednight Nov 2016 #171
For me it is quiet ample in determining his qualification, the best way to Thinkingabout Nov 2016 #172
And that's your subjective opinion. Exilednight Nov 2016 #173
No, you should check what subjective opinion means and then see if this is Thinkingabout Nov 2016 #176
I know exactly what subjective opinion means. What you see as negatives I see as positives. It just Exilednight Nov 2016 #177
Bye, I busy on important issues. Thinkingabout Nov 2016 #179
Honest debate with give and take isn't your thing. Good luck with your issues. Exilednight Nov 2016 #181
Damn right. Bobbie Jo Nov 2016 #70
Those of us who stayed were with her democrattotheend Nov 2016 #77
I voted for the Democratic candidate Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #85
B. Obama and Michelle had it right. "Hillary was most qualified of oasis Nov 2016 #88
I think we have bigger problems than how a few people acted on Democratic Underground. jalan48 Nov 2016 #90
Senate and house were already lost. We weren't able to get them back. LisaL Nov 2016 #91
So that's a problem, right? jalan48 Nov 2016 #92
Well I can't say you'll find anything to argue you I worked against Hillary. DemocraticWing Nov 2016 #95
Please add me to your enemies list... sfwriter Nov 2016 #103
If they fought against Hillary after she won the nomination, they don't belong here. n/t Lil Missy Nov 2016 #122
Well, many left or were shown the door, but MineralMan Nov 2016 #123
K&R! DemonGoddess Nov 2016 #124
Since no one fought against HRC here after the convention aikoaiko Nov 2016 #126
Memories fade so quickly... MineralMan Nov 2016 #128
But not as fast as imaginary resentments are created aikoaiko Nov 2016 #130
Donald? Is that you? Lil Missy Nov 2016 #142
IM me an example if you have one. aikoaiko Nov 2016 #148
That's one of the funniest things I've ever read on this website. TwilightZone Nov 2016 #146
Maybe you could IM me an example. aikoaiko Nov 2016 #147
I will also never forget and never stfu about it bravenak Nov 2016 #131
I'm shocked and surprised, I tell you! MineralMan Nov 2016 #132
I know, right! I'm just so chill you wouldn't guess it of me. Plus humble. bravenak Nov 2016 #153
Put me on your vindictive list right now then Arazi Nov 2016 #133
No, I won't be doing that. Sorry. MineralMan Nov 2016 #134
Uh huh. Right Arazi Nov 2016 #135
are we talking about the same election? mikehiggins Nov 2016 #141
Yep. Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2016 #160
This pretty much sums up the whole thing. Exilednight Nov 2016 #180
Our old friends at JPR are back to suggesting we need a "new" Party...so I wouldn't call them Dems brooklynite Nov 2016 #151
I will also remember you Gothmog Nov 2016 #152
K&R betsuni Nov 2016 #155
MTE .Great post lunamagica Nov 2016 #182
I dont recall anyone fighting against Hillary here after the primary.... INdemo Nov 2016 #183
Well, it wouldn't be DU without years of recrimination. Orsino Nov 2016 #185
Coulda sworn zipplewrath Nov 2016 #186
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If you fought against Hil...»Reply #0