Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I am younger. Please help me understand,Is this how it felt when they elected actor "Ronald Reagan?" [View all]Richard D
(9,363 posts)32. It was bad,
but this is magnitudes worse.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am younger. Please help me understand,Is this how it felt when they elected actor "Ronald Reagan?" [View all]
vrguy
Nov 2016
OP
NO. This was more of a complete slap in the face in what you think the country stood for.
boston bean
Nov 2016
#1
Reagan was an actor and I always felt his entire presidency was an act, hence "The entire election
RKP5637
Nov 2016
#9
Agreed-he was good at reading cue cards-he was literally,"The Acting President".
jalan48
Nov 2016
#11
Yep, Reagan was not crude and rude. I did not like his polices, but he was not a monster like
RKP5637
Nov 2016
#13
Yeap, my understanding is RayGun tried to keep his racism under wraps but DPutin is normalizing his
uponit7771
Nov 2016
#112
And as a result, RR had to have a fleet of competent people behind him, making
LuckyLib
Nov 2016
#61
This is worse. At least Regan was experienced and not openly hostile to so many people and the press
bettyellen
Nov 2016
#27
No, Reagan didn't spend 18 months of an election cycle insulting basic decency and individual rights
Trust Buster
Nov 2016
#31
NO. i was too young to remember but Bush elections were closer but even they were nothing
JI7
Nov 2016
#34
Reagan was a cheap B-List actor, but he at least had political experience.
Drunken Irishman
Nov 2016
#47
No, unchartered terrortory here. I was NEVER afraid of his eagerness to use nukes.
onecaliberal
Nov 2016
#48
One huge difference - the Democratic Party had a lot more power left in 1980 than they do today.
Midwestern Democrat
Nov 2016
#66
Correction: Republicans hated Carter. They villified him everyhwere. Reagan, Bob Hope & Charlton
TeamPooka
Nov 2016
#100
I've wondered whether it was because of republican defensiveness due to Nixon being
no_hypocrisy
Nov 2016
#106
Nixon resigning is what drove the GOP over the edge. Because a Republican was the most
TeamPooka
Nov 2016
#111
Reagan's policies were noxious but he didn't use Trump's naked appeals to barbarism.
Eugene
Nov 2016
#72
Regan was good for Punk Rock and rap music. Gave you something to rebel against.
zonkers
Nov 2016
#73
Unlike now, Democrats still controlled the House comfortably when Reagan was elected.
LonePirate
Nov 2016
#80
I'm not a historian, but Trump could possibly be the worst president ever
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
Nov 2016
#91
Yes. He basically ran away from all his extreme positions in the debate with Carter
andym
Nov 2016
#95
In my opinion, it is exaclty the same. The country made a wrong turn because they'd rather eat
FSogol
Nov 2016
#96
As bad as his policies were Reagan had put in time serving others: as head of SAG and as Gov of CA
TeamPooka
Nov 2016
#99
No. Even in the 60s, on the Get Smart TV series, they made jokes about Reagan becoming President.
randome
Nov 2016
#109
Reagan used racism but he used dog whistles the media could easily ignore.
KittyWampus
Nov 2016
#110