Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: What the AP did was like calling the presidential election on November 1 based on a Gallup poll [View all]TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)21. Your underlying premise is faulty. Interviewing all of the voters involved in a race is not the same
as conducting a poll.
A poll includes a small subset of the total number of voters and is extrapolated based on that sample.
The AP interviewed *all* SDs. There's nothing to extrapolate. The AP knows how every person involved intended to vote, because they personally interviewed every person. Repeatedly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What the AP did was like calling the presidential election on November 1 based on a Gallup poll [View all]
democrattotheend
Jun 2016
OP
No it wasn't ... but go ahead and stomp your feet and pout ... get it out of your system n/t
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#1
It's disappointing, to say the least ... but in 50 years, nobody will remember that AP needed to be
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#18
no, it's more comparable to calling it when a candidate gets the electoral number even though people
JI7
Jun 2016
#2
It was more like calling it September 7th based on RealClear's average.
Joe the Revelator
Jun 2016
#3
In 2008, nobody called the primary until the polls had closed in the last state to vote
democrattotheend
Jun 2016
#10
Bullshit, it's like calling it when a candidate gets to 270 while polls on in Alaska are still open.
Lord Magus
Jun 2016
#7
So if the superdelegates had put John Edwards over the top with endorsements in 2008
democrattotheend
Jun 2016
#22
Sorry, my hypo was assuming that Edwards had also won the pledged delegates
democrattotheend
Jun 2016
#35
Is there anything wrong with predicting the election result based on a Gallup poll?
Nye Bevan
Jun 2016
#11
No actually it's like a normal election where they call it sometimes before California has finished
Dem2
Jun 2016
#19
Your underlying premise is faulty. Interviewing all of the voters involved in a race is not the same
TwilightZone
Jun 2016
#21
So they would have stayed "firm" with John Edwards in 2008 after the scandal broke?
democrattotheend
Jun 2016
#29
Righf because four months of voting had nothing to do with it. Briiliant analaysis.
seabeyond
Jun 2016
#26
As opinions goes and we see plenty here, to predict an outcome and if that outcome turns out to
Thinkingabout
Jun 2016
#28
Which is exactly why they ought to have waited until the pledged delegates had all been allotted
democrattotheend
Jun 2016
#37
"What the AP did was like calling the presidential election on November 1 based on a Gallup poll"
puffy socks
Jun 2016
#36
I have never said Bernie is the only candidate who can beat Trump, or that the elections are rigged
democrattotheend
Jun 2016
#44