Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DetlefK

(16,544 posts)
1. The diagrams on pages 5 and 10 are very interesting:
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 08:44 AM
Jan 2016

If the conspirators kill each other, the probability of a leak peaks very fast and then decays very slowly. Overall probability very low. (~10% in the example)

If the conspirators die off of old age, the probability of a leak peaks after a long time and then decays pretty fast. Overall probability medium. (~40% in the example)

If the number of conspirators stays constant, the probability of a leak increases monotonely over time. The longer the time, the higher the probability someone will eventually spill the beans. (~75% after 60 years in the example, for a group of 5000 conspirators)





Based on parameters derived from blown conspiracies, the model predicts that conspiracies like a moon-landing-hoax or a climate-change-hoax or a vaccination-hoax or a cancer-research-hoax would have been blown the latest after 5-10 years.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»On the Viability of Consp...»Reply #1