Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LeftishBrit

(41,307 posts)
6. I disagree
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 03:25 AM
Aug 2014

Certainly this is sometimes true, and there are many many issues on which both sides are wrong; but not always.

Sometimes the facts are not yet known, and will eventually come to light, proving one side or the other right.

Sometimes arguments are not about facts but opinion or moral outlook; e.g. I consider the Thatcherite/Republican approach to poverty morally utterly wrong, but it's not a scientific fact that can be proved. One might be able to prove that a particular policy will increase poverty, but some people will then argue that this is not a bad consequence if it increases the freedom of rich people to make more money/ that the fear of poverty increases competition and 'productivity'/ that it's not the government's job to reduce poverty/etc.

Sometimes paranoia overrides factual evidence as in the vaccination debates.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Interesting that he makes the same observation Rainforestgoddess Aug 2014 #1
Well, NDT is certainly facing plenty of silly vitriol from the anti-GMO crowd. HuckleB Aug 2014 #2
True. But he must have anticipated Rainforestgoddess Aug 2014 #3
All too true. HuckleB Aug 2014 #4
I can't agree, uriel1972 Aug 2014 #5
I disagree LeftishBrit Aug 2014 #6
I not only disagree, but I think SheilaT Aug 2014 #7
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»If an argument lasts more...»Reply #6