Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
7. I actually agree with you on this one Mr. Wolf. And by the way so did the late Senator from South
Mon Jul 21, 2014, 01:38 AM
Jul 2014

Dakota, George McGovern. In his 2001 book, The Third Freedom: Ending Hunger in Our Time - he strongly and passionately argued in defense of the using of genetic science to attack global malnutrition.

In so much of the world most people have little to eat other than rice which in itself does not provide anywhere near adequate nutrition. Genetically modified rice can totally change that. Sure there are legitimate concerns about corporate control and some measures and international treaties should be enacted to deal with that. But there are legitimate concerns about negative affects on economy from tackling the issues of manmade global warming - but in both cases that is no reason to throw away science and actually hurt rather than help the world's least fortunate people.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»GMO woo being used to pil...»Reply #7