Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

mr blur

(7,753 posts)
13. Well, no-one is claiming that the Mona Lisa,
Wed Dec 21, 2011, 01:20 PM
Dec 2011

was generated by a supernatural event which left an image of a dead supernatural being for whose existence there is absolutely no other historical proof whatsoever.

We should just disregard evidence from carbon dating and other MarkCharles Dec 2011 #1
The date is likely correct jberryhill Dec 2011 #8
repaired by interweaving new fibers from time to time. AlbertCat Dec 2011 #9
What are the oldest fabric samples available? jberryhill Dec 2011 #11
What are the oldest fabric samples available? AlbertCat Dec 2011 #16
I'll have to put that on my list jberryhill Dec 2011 #18
And where has the vanillin loss technique skepticscott Dec 2011 #37
These are the sorts of "scientists" we see posting at EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #2
What do you make of this guy jberryhill Dec 2011 #23
They just proved the existence of time travel! DavidDvorkin Dec 2011 #3
So, because these "scientists" can only copy it using high-intensity ultra violet lasers, mr blur Dec 2011 #4
Glad you properly used quotes around the word scientists there. n/t trotsky Dec 2011 #5
I once heard, the image was probably created with chemicals: a photography of a male model. DetlefK Dec 2011 #6
Only a model with abnormal arms muriel_volestrangler Dec 2011 #25
I'm going to go with the physical/chemical evidence TZ Dec 2011 #7
these "scientists" are funded by someone much like the "Discovery Institute", AlbertCat Dec 2011 #10
"Of course it's a fake." jberryhill Dec 2011 #12
Well, no-one is claiming that the Mona Lisa, mr blur Dec 2011 #13
There are people who claim the pyramids were built by ancient aliens jberryhill Dec 2011 #14
The accusation is not that the artifact itself is fake, as it obviously exists mr blur Dec 2011 #15
I didn't think we were arguing about anything jberryhill Dec 2011 #19
I suppose next you'll tell me that the Mayan ruins are "fake" because the deities to whom they were AlbertCat Dec 2011 #17
Since we don't know its maker, we don't know the maker's intent jberryhill Dec 2011 #20
Do you think the shroud has supernatural origins? EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #21
No I do not believe it has supernatural origins jberryhill Dec 2011 #22
It's a fraud, or a hoax might have been better wording, uriel1972 Dec 2011 #24
Well, if by "unknown and unexplained" skepticscott Dec 2011 #28
The relic business was highly competitive jberryhill Dec 2011 #29
Well, it is a subject of debate skepticscott Dec 2011 #30
Yep.... jberryhill Dec 2011 #31
Well, that's one tack that's been taken skepticscott Dec 2011 #32
But that's one of the properties of miracles jberryhill Dec 2011 #33
How can you be sure skepticscott Dec 2011 #34
That's a very sneaky question jberryhill Dec 2011 #35
Not sneaky....just revealing of the fact skepticscott Dec 2011 #36
I'm not always entirely serious jberryhill Dec 2011 #38
Uh, a fake burial shroud skepticscott Dec 2011 #27
That is a Laugh-Out-Loud title. Boston_Chemist Dec 2011 #26
I wonder Alexande1304 Jan 2012 #39
The Shroud is really small potatoes compared to the really amazing relic. The Prepuce of Jesus. dimbear Feb 2012 #40
Dozens of fake relics were created and sold in medieval times. DetlefK Feb 2012 #41
And some of the most avid collectors: the Nazis. Just like in the movie. dimbear Feb 2012 #42
Some people fightforfreedom123 Mar 2012 #43
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Scientists say Turin Shro...»Reply #13