Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
8. The date is likely correct
Wed Dec 21, 2011, 11:09 AM
Dec 2011

However, there are some interesting criticisms.

For one thing, this is not a pristine artifact either. It has been extensively handled and even repaired by interweaving new fibers from time to time. After its original appearance in France, it was acquired by the Savoy family and moved around quite a bit prior to its current home in Turin. During that time, it was exposed to several fires and other misadventures. The carbon dating samples were taken from an edge region which some critics claim shows evidence of repairs. Additionally, various backing fabrics have been sewn on to it over the course of time, and it has been stored in intimate contact with those backings and whatever contaminants may have been on them.

Aside from contamination by handling and repairs over the centuries, it is inhabited by micro-organisms, which have lived and died on it, leaving a crust of newer organic matter on the exterior surface of the fibers.

It's one thing to dig up an ancient fire pit and analyze the undisturbed remains thereof, but this is not something that has been preserved as an archaeological specimen in the course of its lifetime.

Of course it is significant that the date obtained by the prior round of radiocarbon dating corresponds fairly well to the first recorded evidence of its appearance.
We should just disregard evidence from carbon dating and other MarkCharles Dec 2011 #1
The date is likely correct jberryhill Dec 2011 #8
repaired by interweaving new fibers from time to time. AlbertCat Dec 2011 #9
What are the oldest fabric samples available? jberryhill Dec 2011 #11
What are the oldest fabric samples available? AlbertCat Dec 2011 #16
I'll have to put that on my list jberryhill Dec 2011 #18
And where has the vanillin loss technique skepticscott Dec 2011 #37
These are the sorts of "scientists" we see posting at EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #2
What do you make of this guy jberryhill Dec 2011 #23
They just proved the existence of time travel! DavidDvorkin Dec 2011 #3
So, because these "scientists" can only copy it using high-intensity ultra violet lasers, mr blur Dec 2011 #4
Glad you properly used quotes around the word scientists there. n/t trotsky Dec 2011 #5
I once heard, the image was probably created with chemicals: a photography of a male model. DetlefK Dec 2011 #6
Only a model with abnormal arms muriel_volestrangler Dec 2011 #25
I'm going to go with the physical/chemical evidence TZ Dec 2011 #7
these "scientists" are funded by someone much like the "Discovery Institute", AlbertCat Dec 2011 #10
"Of course it's a fake." jberryhill Dec 2011 #12
Well, no-one is claiming that the Mona Lisa, mr blur Dec 2011 #13
There are people who claim the pyramids were built by ancient aliens jberryhill Dec 2011 #14
The accusation is not that the artifact itself is fake, as it obviously exists mr blur Dec 2011 #15
I didn't think we were arguing about anything jberryhill Dec 2011 #19
I suppose next you'll tell me that the Mayan ruins are "fake" because the deities to whom they were AlbertCat Dec 2011 #17
Since we don't know its maker, we don't know the maker's intent jberryhill Dec 2011 #20
Do you think the shroud has supernatural origins? EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #21
No I do not believe it has supernatural origins jberryhill Dec 2011 #22
It's a fraud, or a hoax might have been better wording, uriel1972 Dec 2011 #24
Well, if by "unknown and unexplained" skepticscott Dec 2011 #28
The relic business was highly competitive jberryhill Dec 2011 #29
Well, it is a subject of debate skepticscott Dec 2011 #30
Yep.... jberryhill Dec 2011 #31
Well, that's one tack that's been taken skepticscott Dec 2011 #32
But that's one of the properties of miracles jberryhill Dec 2011 #33
How can you be sure skepticscott Dec 2011 #34
That's a very sneaky question jberryhill Dec 2011 #35
Not sneaky....just revealing of the fact skepticscott Dec 2011 #36
I'm not always entirely serious jberryhill Dec 2011 #38
Uh, a fake burial shroud skepticscott Dec 2011 #27
That is a Laugh-Out-Loud title. Boston_Chemist Dec 2011 #26
I wonder Alexande1304 Jan 2012 #39
The Shroud is really small potatoes compared to the really amazing relic. The Prepuce of Jesus. dimbear Feb 2012 #40
Dozens of fake relics were created and sold in medieval times. DetlefK Feb 2012 #41
And some of the most avid collectors: the Nazis. Just like in the movie. dimbear Feb 2012 #42
Some people fightforfreedom123 Mar 2012 #43
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Scientists say Turin Shro...»Reply #8