Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

defacto7

(13,635 posts)
12. Although at first glance this looked promising.
Mon Mar 25, 2019, 04:06 PM
Mar 2019

But it really doesn't represent much. Nones may not even be atheist, they just don't belong to a religion. Being atheist is the state of not believing in a deity but they can belong to a religion. Buddhism is an atheist religion for the most part. I know Catholics, Methodists and Episcopalians who are atheist. Most atheists don't belong to any religion. So there's something wrong with this poll in my opinion because it doesn't tell you much of anything about what nones think.

If the point is simply to measure those who belong to a particular religion compared to those who don't then I guess they have succeeded in something, but that would leave out a lot of people that fit both or neither catagory.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»"Nones" Are Statistically...»Reply #12