Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NeoGreen

(4,033 posts)
3. No doubt...
Sat Dec 23, 2017, 08:37 AM
Dec 2017

...but they do/will exist.

I like the framework where Wave 1 was a practical criticism on the negative effects of religion and where Wave 2 should be focused on criticizing the current biblical scholarship, such as it is and the text.

Bart Ehrman could be a good example.

Wave 2 doesn't have to be as large, popular or celebrated as Wave 1 to be effective.

I found the following as an interesting and related POV:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/atheology/2017/03/christianity-thriving-critics-arent-enough/

Is Christianity Thriving Because its Critics Aren’t Doing Enough?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

TL;DR Voltaire2 Dec 2017 #1
Atheists have read and studied the Bible Maggiemayhem Dec 2017 #2
I agree but this manifesto is about academic studies. Voltaire2 Dec 2017 #4
No doubt... NeoGreen Dec 2017 #3
This would end religion Cartoonist Dec 2017 #5
You say that like it's a... NeoGreen Dec 2017 #6
I don't think study of *scripture* is particularly important; it's modern religious thinking muriel_volestrangler Jan 2018 #7
I agree, but... NeoGreen Jan 2018 #8
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»The Second Wave of the Ne...»Reply #3