Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marble falls

(62,441 posts)
5. Atheists Are Nicer Than Christians, But There's a Complicated Twist
Tue Dec 12, 2017, 06:32 PM
Dec 2017
http://www.sciencealert.com/atheists-are-nicer-than-christians-but-only-when-they-have-something-to-prove

Stereotyping much?
MICHELLE STARR
8 SEP 2017

Atheists are much fairer to Christians than Christians are to atheists, according to a new study that has analysed interactions between the two groups.

But if you're an atheist, don't get too excited about your moral superiority yet. The study suggests that atheists are nicer in an attempt to compensate for the stereotype that atheists are immoral.

Researchers at Ohio University were seeking to study in-group bias and prosocial behaviour, or the tendency groups have to favour their own members.

"We often see that negative stereotypes about a group can lead members of that group to behave in compensatory ways that ostensibly seek to disconfirm that stereotype, such as when American immigrants strive to emphasise their American identity when it is threatened," researcher Colleen Cowgill told Psypost.

"This was the rationale behind my hypotheses stating that atheists' behaviour toward Christians in economic games might be different from Christians' behaviour toward atheists in economic games."

The study was divided into three parts. The first part was conducted using 297 subjects, 150 Christians and 147 atheists. These participants were tasked to play a game based on the Dictator Game, in which one player gives the other player an amount of money.

It was designed to test how self-interested people are, with the general prediction that very few people will choose to give their partner money when there are no consequences involved.

The researchers modified the game, however, so that participants were led to believe that several rounds of the game would be played, and that the other player would give them a reputation score that other people could see.

They were told that the other person knew that they were Christian or atheist. They were then told whether they were paired with a fictional Christian or atheist. Each of them was then told they had the task of dividing up the money they had been given.

The second part of the study, involving 233 different participants, 151 Christians and 82 atheists, was almost exactly the same, except for some key differences. The second group didn't know that they weren't partnered with real people, and they had to complete a survey afterwards that evaluated the morality of their partner.

What these parts both found was that Christians gave more money to Christians than they gave to atheists, but that atheists gave the same amount to everyone, regardless of religious status.

However, the third part of the study, involving 524 participants, 140 atheists and 384 Christians, showed that this discrepancy isn't purely motivated by altruism. These participants were divided into two groups. The first was told that the other person would not be informed of their religious status. The second was told that they would.

When atheists thought that Christians would not know of their atheism, they showed as much in-group bias as Christians did, giving more money to fellow atheists than Christians.

For rest of the article use link

http://www.sciencealert.com/atheists-are-nicer-than-christians-but-only-when-they-have-something-to-prove

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»:SHOCKER: Atheists are ni...»Reply #5