Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atheists & Agnostics

(28,260 posts)

7. Well said!

Thu Jun 1, 2017, 07:14 PM

Jun 2017

Thank you!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Would there be a Republican party without ... [View all] Duppers Jun 2017 OP

It would probably look like Eisenhower's party CanonRay Jun 2017 #1

I agree. Duppers Jun 2017 #6

Young and Libertarian seem to go together CanonRay Jun 2017 #11

Of course, there would be. Iggo Jun 2017 #2

I'm gonna go with no Beearewhyain Jun 2017 #3

Well said! Duppers Jun 2017 #7

Yes. There would still be white supremacists and nationalistic "patriots". Binkie The Clown Jun 2017 #4

You're probably right mountain grammy Jun 2017 #5

Exactly! Duppers Jun 2017 #9

True. Duppers Jun 2017 #8

The current radial repugs seem to be the heirs of George Wallace, rurallib Jun 2017 #10

A look into their personality type Duppers Jun 2017 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author Freelancer Jun 2017 #13

Yes, we are by nature tribal. Duppers Jun 2017 #17

To complete the assembly, you really need religion. trotsky Jun 2017 #14

My thoughts and feelings exactly. Duppers Jun 2017 #18

I think children are basically born as empty vessels Bayard Jun 2017 #15

Thank You! Duppers Jun 2017 #16

Age old question, nature or nurture? beam me up scottie Jun 2017 #20

Yes it is. Duppers Jun 2017 #21

Good for you and your son, Duppers! beam me up scottie Jun 2017 #22

Love this! Duppers Jun 2017 #23