Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
7. That Idaho Constitution provision is pretty sweeping.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:14 PM
Mar 2016

You write:

They act like they can't teach bible stuff as part of a secular course in English or anthropology or history.


Teaching Bible stuff in such a secular course would be a sensible rule but it's apparently not the Idaho rule. Per the linked article:

The Idaho Constitution says, “No books, papers, tracts or documents of a political, sectarian or denominational character shall be used.”


I read that as saying that students could be assigned to read something about religious revivals in colonial America but could not be assigned to read Edwards's sermon itself, let alone any excerpts from the Bible.

The ban even includes material of a "political" character. That means they couldn't read Washington's "Farewell Address" or King's "I Have a Dream" speech or a host of other important documents. My guess is that the provision isn't strictly enforced.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Idaho Republican: Bibles ...»Reply #7