Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Promethean

(468 posts)
20. So about the historical accuracy of the Jesus story.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 07:47 PM
Mar 2016

I read a book by a historian and he laid it out like this but of course much wordier.

There was a time period when the Romans ruled over the Hebrews and weren't exactly nice about it. This isn't surprising as they weren't nice to anybody that they conquered. There was an upper class of wealthy Hebrews who worked with the Romans and basically ran the religion. There were a lot of street preachers at that time with doomsday and anti-wealth messages. It is likely at least one of those preachers got a following. It is not unreasonable that a radicalized preacher would ransack one of the symbols of wealth of the wealthy overclass. It is not unreasonable that a radical preacher that got a following and/or attacked the wealthy would get arrested and executed. Jesus was a commonly used name back then. The tradition is still carried forward to this day in some cultures (how many Hey-soos' do you know?). Finally; people tell stories, they miss-attribute people for deeds, they mix up names and other common errors.

Mix the previous in with ideas from other well known mythologies and viola.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well, personally I couldn't care less whether or not "Jesus" ever existed, historically. mr blur Mar 2016 #1
There is no doubt the overall themes of the story of Jesus are present in many mythologies. trotsky Mar 2016 #2
I had already been a non-believer for many years OriginalGeek Mar 2016 #14
The similarities between Jesus, Horus, et all, are the least of it Brainstormy Mar 2016 #3
My concern is simply about some of the details of the similarities... Silent3 Mar 2016 #4
Don't get started on Moses! AlbertCat Mar 2016 #6
I don't think.... AlbertCat Mar 2016 #5
Ever see edhopper Mar 2016 #7
It's a pointless argument over a meaningless claim. Christianity is based on Judaism muriel_volestrangler Mar 2016 #8
Overwhelming evidence? uriel1972 Mar 2016 #9
Jesus definitely existed. He's my 89th cousin's daughter's kid on my mom's side :) Freelancer Mar 2016 #10
Cookie Cutter Christs... NeoGreen Mar 2016 #11
I can't see any similarity in the Mithra Wikipedia article muriel_volestrangler Mar 2016 #12
I've encounted a lot of this before, I'm just wondering if the degree of similiarity... Silent3 Mar 2016 #13
So the comparisons of one bullshit story to a bunch of other bullshit stories don't hold up? Iggo Mar 2016 #15
It might be a "yawn" in the overall picture of "believe/don't believe"... Silent3 Mar 2016 #16
I got away from "believe/don't believe" and now I look at it as "real/not real". Iggo Mar 2016 #17
In the big picture, historical jesus is irrelevant. Supernatural jesus is a myth, end of story. cleanhippie Mar 2016 #18
From the viewpoint of a believer that might be having doubts, however... Silent3 Mar 2016 #19
So about the historical accuracy of the Jesus story. Promethean Mar 2016 #20
I'm certainly willing to believe that there might actually be a real man behind the myth... Silent3 Mar 2016 #21
The Romans! trotsky Mar 2016 #22
Depends on how you want it to "stand up" whatthehey Mar 2016 #23
I didn't watch the documentary so I'm not entirely sure about what some of the references are Major Nikon Mar 2016 #24
This isn't about matching a possible real-life Jesus, however... Silent3 Mar 2016 #25
I understood that part Major Nikon Mar 2016 #26
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»How well do the much-tout...»Reply #20