Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onager

(9,356 posts)
16. You're not alone with Plato.
Fri Aug 28, 2015, 02:10 PM
Aug 2015

I'm always suspicious when religious believers try to drag me into "deep philosophical discussions about whether god exists or not."

When they do that, they usually want us to ignore the plain evidence - no Pillars Of Fire or resurrections or half-god babies born in the last few thousand years, and no real evidence for their god. But if they can drag us from the "real" to the "philosophical," they can play a never-ending What-If game where anything is possible.

And no wonder Plato is their favorite philosopher. Much of his fantastical bullshit is equal to Xianity's fantastical bullshit.

I like this review of Plato's "Republic." Simon Blackburn wrote it for The Guardian in 2006:

The work is long, sprawling and meandering. Far from holding water, its arguments range from ordinarily leaky to leaky in that zany way which leaves some interpreters unable to recognise them as ever intended to hold water at all. Its apparent theory of human nature is fanciful, and might seem inconsistent. Its apparent political implications are mainly disagreeable, and often appalling.

In so far as Plato has a legacy in politics, it includes theocracy or rule by priests, militarism, nationalism, hierarchy, illiberalism, totalitarianism and complete disdain of the economic structures of society, born in his case of privileged slave-ownership. In Republic he managed to attach himself both to the most static conservatism and to the most wild-eyed utopianism. On top of all that, the book's theory of knowledge is a disaster...

We know very little about Plato, and what there is to know is not generally appealing. If he is put in historical context, we may find an archetypal grumpy old man, a disenchanted aristocrat, hating the Athenian democracy, convinced that the wrong people are in charge, with a deep fear of democracy itself, constantly sneering at artisans, farmers and indeed all productive labour, deeply contemptuous of any workers' ambition for education, and finally manifesting a hankering after the appalling military despotism of Sparta.

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2006/aug/05/shopping.plato

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I always found it interesting... uriel1972 Aug 2015 #1
that's really a funny coincidence, isn't it ProfessorPlum Aug 2015 #3
But isn't that why there are so many religions, Curmudgeoness Aug 2015 #2
Thanks. I hope I can bring some other people along that road faster than I got there ProfessorPlum Aug 2015 #4
I am not sure that there is a fast lane Curmudgeoness Aug 2015 #5
I agree. And I think what you are doing is great ProfessorPlum Aug 2015 #7
Religion is ego driven AlbertCat Aug 2015 #6
Your reasoning is wrong. DetlefK Aug 2015 #8
assumes facts not in evidence ProfessorPlum Aug 2015 #9
Understanding is not necessary for belief. DetlefK Aug 2015 #10
"the premise that the god exists only in the head of the believer" ProfessorPlum Aug 2015 #13
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Then your proof is entirely useless and pointless. DetlefK Aug 2015 #17
don't pull something ProfessorPlum Aug 2015 #18
If you make up a god, of course it has your morals. DetlefK Sep 2015 #21
what I'm saying holds whether you make up the god or somebody else does ProfessorPlum Sep 2015 #22
For example, the group construction "Yahweh" is said to think slavery is ok ProfessorPlum Aug 2015 #20
Why do you assume that a hypothetical god would necessarily be morally superior? LiberalAndProud Aug 2015 #12
he is assuming that gods are superior in all aspects Warren Stupidity Aug 2015 #19
I always had a hard time with Plato RussBLib Aug 2015 #11
that's also a persuasive argument :) ProfessorPlum Aug 2015 #14
That was how I made the leap from belief to non-belief. Curmudgeoness Aug 2015 #15
You're not alone with Plato. onager Aug 2015 #16
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Either you agree with god...»Reply #16