Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atheists & Agnostics

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)

1. It seems to me that it should be straight forward

Reply to onager (Original post)

Fri Jul 31, 2015, 01:05 PM

Jul 2015

as to the ownership. How can this be a clusterfuck? Whose name is the deed is? Who is paying for the maintenance? Why should this be so hard to determine???

If it was given to the nuns, it is their property. If it was given to the "church", it is owned by the RCC. My understanding is that all property is the church's, but that may not be the case.

But I have to give credit to those nuns for giving the middle finger to the Archdiocese.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I Pissed Off A Nun - Katy Perry's Convent [View all] onager Jul 2015 OP

It seems to me that it should be straight forward Curmudgeoness Jul 2015 #1

The original will has to be registered somewhere Warpy Jul 2015 #2

Bribe his way out of hell isn't an accurate metaphor. Promethean Jul 2015 #3

How is this not a form of indulgence? LiberalAndProud Aug 2015 #5

"I Pissed Off A Nun - And I Liked It!" mr blur Aug 2015 #4