Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atheists & Agnostics

(48,181 posts)

9. I've heard right here that we should consider his interpretation just as valid as any other.

Thu May 28, 2015, 07:39 PM

May 2015

Only for some reason when it comes to creationist idiocy, that doctrine does not apply.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A Creationist Just Made a Huge Scientific Discovery… Really! [View all] mr blur May 2015 OP

What a bizarre thing marym625 May 2015 #1

I really do hate that this guy found that fossil.. mountain grammy May 2015 #2

Naw. Or rather, Gnaw. ChairmanAgnostic May 2015 #3

Yeah, I think he's feeling the gnaw.. mountain grammy May 2015 #8

He wasn't stupid enough to destroy it immediately Warpy May 2015 #4

Exactly, which is why I'll cut this guy a lot of slack Warpy May 2015 #6

That crossed my mind too.. and it's a good point. mountain grammy May 2015 #7

Reminds me of that lotto commercial when the numbers keep turning up on the Baitball Blogger May 2015 #11

A fossil put there by Satan! progressoid May 2015 #10

This proves Cartoonist May 2015 #12