Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atheists & Agnostics

drm604

(16,230 posts)

8. I've always assumed that the majority of Conservapedia's traffic comes from people like you,

Reply to Ratty (Reply #6)

Wed May 27, 2015, 09:41 PM

May 2015

who read it for yucks, and links from articles talking about how stupid/funny it is.

I doubt that many people, regardless of their politics, use it as an actual information source.

Wikipedia often shows up high in the results for things I google. I don't recall Conservapedia ever showing up as a result for anything other than a search for "Conservapedia".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Our occasional Look into the World of Whackjobs: #4 - Andy Schlafly (Loooong) [View all] mr blur May 2015 OP

YIKES! marym625 May 2015 #1

Excellent work as usual! trotsky May 2015 #2

Spawn of Phyllis.. no surprise. mountain grammy May 2015 #3

A great article but I wish I'd never heard that laugh... Jokerman May 2015 #4

Ouch nil desperandum May 2015 #5

LOL, of course it doesn't make sense..... Curmudgeoness May 2015 #7

Conservapedia is a guilty pleasure Ratty May 2015 #6

I've always assumed that the majority of Conservapedia's traffic comes from people like you, drm604 May 2015 #8

"Vermin News Network" onager May 2015 #9