Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
In reply to the discussion: 7 Weird Realities Of Growing Up Without A Religion [View all]F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)24. ...damn.
I so wish I could do that for Halloween. Get a bunch of friends together and go as a group of zombie gods
The children probably wouldn't care, but we could scare the crap out of the adults
Also, let's be clear on this: Jesus was never a zombie!
He was a lich:
Except!!! He might not actually be, according to recent scholarly analysis rooted in D&D manuals (which I think are just as valid as the original source for Jesus).
https://rolltodisbelieve.wordpress.com/2014/04/21/hes-not-a-zombie-or-a-lich/
The Facebook meme posits that hes really a lich, which is a very powerful undead cleric or wizard whos used ancient, evil magicks to keep his body alive. Unfortunately, a lich doesnt quite fit the bill either:
Next I considered some of the other usual suspects, but the story of Jesus just didnt fit any of those either. He cant be an illithid (mind flayer) because illithids are allergic to sunlight (along with a number of other potential candidates, like vampires), and the Gospels often mention Jesus being out in the sunlight and not at all scary-looking. Its doubtful hes a shapechanged dragon because he just doesnt seem smart enough or wise enough for that, though admittedly this Monster Manual is AD&D so the newer versions may have allowed for some different kinds of shape-changing dragons (sorry, Christians; looked at from the outside, nothing he said or did really seems very original and he didnt do a single thing to definitively amend or fix the atrocious Old Testaments slavery-advocating, rape-apologizing, woman-marginalizing, tribalism-enforcing, ignorance-celebrating stances, like tell people dont keep slaves or stop worrying about what other people do in private or even tell humans about Germ Theory or anything really useful).
I pored over the manual but found only one entry that really fit the bill.
Folks, we are going to have to entertain the serious idea that Jesus is actually a D&D-style Rakshasa (which, Im sure I dont need to mention, bears little relation to the real East Indian concept of them). The D&D-style Rakshasa fits him a lot better. Check this description out:
I just want to say: WOW. That seems to work better. A Rakshasa may have either been acting like Jesus the whole time, pretending to die during the Crucifixion and then resurrecting to get closer to his prey, or else took the place of him afterward and ate the bodywhich would make his followers even more convinced that hed resurrected!
Their touch is so cold as to cause 1-10 points of damage and paralyze opponents who fail to make their saving throw. The mere sight of a lich will cause any creature below 5th level (or 5 hit dice) to flee in panic from fear. . . A lich appears very much as does a wight or mummy, being of skeletal form, eyesockets mere black holes with glowing points of light, and garments most often rotting (but most rich).
Next I considered some of the other usual suspects, but the story of Jesus just didnt fit any of those either. He cant be an illithid (mind flayer) because illithids are allergic to sunlight (along with a number of other potential candidates, like vampires), and the Gospels often mention Jesus being out in the sunlight and not at all scary-looking. Its doubtful hes a shapechanged dragon because he just doesnt seem smart enough or wise enough for that, though admittedly this Monster Manual is AD&D so the newer versions may have allowed for some different kinds of shape-changing dragons (sorry, Christians; looked at from the outside, nothing he said or did really seems very original and he didnt do a single thing to definitively amend or fix the atrocious Old Testaments slavery-advocating, rape-apologizing, woman-marginalizing, tribalism-enforcing, ignorance-celebrating stances, like tell people dont keep slaves or stop worrying about what other people do in private or even tell humans about Germ Theory or anything really useful).
I pored over the manual but found only one entry that really fit the bill.
Folks, we are going to have to entertain the serious idea that Jesus is actually a D&D-style Rakshasa (which, Im sure I dont need to mention, bears little relation to the real East Indian concept of them). The D&D-style Rakshasa fits him a lot better. Check this description out:
Known first in India, these evil spirits encased in flesh are spreading. They are fond of a diet of human meat, and as masters of illusion they can easily gain this end. Rakshasas are able to employ ESP and then create the illusion of what those who have encountered them deem friendly. They can then withhold attack until their prey can be taken off-guard. Although capable of using both magic users spells (up to 3rd level) and clerics spells (1st level), they are not affected by spells under the 8th level. Rakshasas cannot be harmed by non-magical weapons. . .
I just want to say: WOW. That seems to work better. A Rakshasa may have either been acting like Jesus the whole time, pretending to die during the Crucifixion and then resurrecting to get closer to his prey, or else took the place of him afterward and ate the bodywhich would make his followers even more convinced that hed resurrected!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
26 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations