Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onager

(9,356 posts)
4. Very tough choice this time.
Mon May 11, 2015, 10:55 AM
May 2015

Went with Harris. Because his comment says so much in so few words.

And I'm probably influenced by a long online debate I was reading last night. Actually a Comment section of a blog where believers and nons- were arguing.

Believers suggested atheists were a bunch of ignorant know-nothings, unqualified to snark about religion unless they had read, at least, all of Aquinas. Also claimed many non-believers had been converted by reading all of Aquinas, since his logic for God's existence was irrefutable. Etc.

One atheist said they had done exactly that and remained unconverted. Because Aquinas was obviously dealing off the bottom of the deck, since all his arguments proceeded from the assumption that God did exist. A problem common to all those Great Xian Philosophers so beloved by the admirers of the Emperor's new duds.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That last one says it all! mountain grammy May 2015 #1
That last one says it all! AlbertCat May 2015 #9
Wow, that's it! Excellent, thank you. mountain grammy May 2015 #10
Wow, tough choice this week, they're all so good Rob H. May 2015 #2
That was a close one. nt mr blur May 2015 #3
Very tough choice this time. onager May 2015 #4
I gave love to Absurdity Curmudgeoness May 2015 #5
Not like the others Lordquinton May 2015 #6
Yes, me too. beam me up scottie May 2015 #7
I'm going with Harris Warren Stupidity May 2015 #8
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»POLL: Meme of the Week – ...»Reply #4