Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
14. True enough. But we have to consider Flatland
Tue May 5, 2015, 10:56 AM
May 2015

An old and childish but slyly profound book. Most will know it but for those who don't it's a 3 dimensional figure trying to explain physical reality to 2-dimensional beings. Well worth a (re-)read when considering metaphysics. We understand the shared biology of mold and humanity because it is immanent in the world of our senses. There could be other biologies which are not. We cannot see UV or IR. We know they exist only because very clever people theorized, then experimented, then demonstrated. But try to explain them even to an intelligent mind like, say, Alfred the Great and you'll see a tiny sliver of the problem of humanity attempting to understand a putative god.

We are all in Flatland not just vis a vis deities but dimensions ourselves. Some physics equations, which I won't pretend to understand, only work if you posit 11 dimensions. I can't hope to explain that world. How could I hope to explain possible sentience not based on carbon?

Now let's be clear. I don't believe for a fraction of a second that some divine creator is lurking in the 11th dimension waiting to be demonstrated like infra-red light. It's so infinitesimal a probability it's not worth anything beyond idle metaphysical chit-chat like this. It's not impossible per se, and certainly not disprovable, but even if that one in a few quadrillion chance hits and some god ends up popping out of the multiverse's woodwork, I think we can safely bet it's not too worried about prayers, what we do on Sundays/Saturdays/Fridays, what some what some Levantine scribes put in the Torah/Gospels/Qu'ran, or how we use our genitalia, although the latter is likely to cause it some wry amusement.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nepal.... mountain grammy May 2015 #1
God is a theory ... GeorgeGist May 2015 #2
Not really, any more than religionistas can know that it does. mr blur May 2015 #3
Why is God different from edhopper May 2015 #4
I'm not saying God is an alien but, progressoid May 2015 #23
As Epicurus would say edhopper May 2015 #26
There's a particular defender of the faith here on DU... trotsky May 2015 #7
You will notice edhopper May 2015 #12
So-called "strong atheism" skepticscott May 2015 #5
I guess that would depend edhopper May 2015 #8
We can definitely know that certain gods don't exist. trotsky May 2015 #6
No RussBLib May 2015 #9
Also, the cranks who make this nonsense up are always smart - mr blur May 2015 #10
I was about to get into that. Warren Stupidity May 2015 #20
That is very well said edhopper May 2015 #29
he is "outside the physical Universe. AlbertCat May 2015 #40
Rec post. beam me up scottie May 2015 #30
Logically self-contradictory ones only whatthehey May 2015 #11
Thanks edhopper May 2015 #13
True enough. But we have to consider Flatland whatthehey May 2015 #14
I''ve read Gamow edhopper May 2015 #15
I don't know fir sure that there is no god, but Binkie The Clown May 2015 #19
The bugger is, not entirely no whatthehey May 2015 #25
Another great post! beam me up scottie May 2015 #31
invisible Snake God spirit AlbertCat May 2015 #41
I know that God doesn't exist. Curmudgeoness May 2015 #16
That's true edhopper May 2015 #17
Steady State Universe? Binkie The Clown May 2015 #18
Not really edhopper May 2015 #27
We assume that velocity is the only thing that causes red shift AlbertCat May 2015 #42
You're very probably right. Binkie The Clown May 2015 #43
Let's leave the large cosmological questions for now. edhopper May 2015 #44
I agree on a practical level, Binkie The Clown May 2015 #46
True edhopper May 2015 #47
I can know that XYZ claims of specific gods are bullshit. AtheistCrusader May 2015 #21
Wow! salimbag May 2015 #22
your welcome. edhopper May 2015 #28
Of course not. LiberalAndProud May 2015 #24
Nothing to add, everyone else has already noted why it's impossible to argue the point. beam me up scottie May 2015 #32
impossible to argue with believers edhopper May 2015 #34
Agreed! beam me up scottie May 2015 #35
Thus i posted this here edhopper May 2015 #37
I have seen no evidence that god exists. Manifestor_of_Light May 2015 #33
Same here. And all believers seem to have two gods... onager May 2015 #36
It's like the psychics who have edhopper May 2015 #38
Isn't there a third one? You know, the one that shows up on toast... truebrit71 May 2015 #39
LOL! That reminds me of "I, Claudius." onager May 2015 #45
No. Act_of_Reparation May 2015 #48
That is probably a better term for it. edhopper May 2015 #49
Absolutely. Act_of_Reparation May 2015 #50
So it would come down to how edhopper May 2015 #51
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Can we "know" G...»Reply #14