Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NJCher

(39,551 posts)
5. Summary and comments
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 12:39 PM
Mar 23

I'll give you the bad news first: it looks like Schimmel is going to win. The good news is that the "win" is going to disgust the electorate so much that Schimmel might recuse himself from cases where he has an interest.

That certainly might include ones that musk is watching come down the pike. David says that musk has an interest in certain cases and that is why he has put up his voter bribe of $100.

David qualifies his statement by checking his notes and yes, indeed, Schimmel was out stumping with trump for votes. Anyone who would so overtly side with trump would probably not do the "right' thing. The cards, however, say there is a fair chance he might.

Here is why musk's technique with the $100 is probably going to be so effective. I doubt musk even knows this, but I happen to know it because the psychological step he puts voters through was actually the topic of my Master's degree thesis.

Sheltie, you probably know about this as I understand you did grad work in psychology.

Here's how it works:
1. when you are trying to get someone to do something, you get them to say yes to some little thing first.

2. In this case, the "little thing" is to sign a petition. So the prospective voter does that.

3. Now when it comes to voting, the "big ask," in the voter's mind he/she has to be consistent with the previous act (what they signed the petition for).

4. Consequently, anyone who signed that petition who is a voter, is probably going to vote for Schimmel.

David often ends his readings with " these are the energies at this time," and of course, things could change, too. The election is on April 1, so there is 9 days to change the energies.

To sum up the cards:

--why is musk doing this?
response: he has cases he wants to be decided a certain way
--Page of pentacles: it costs so little money to buy an election
--Death card: things are not going musk's way, so he has to pull out the stops to move the momentum in his direction
--10 wands: it's going to be tough going for him

--what's the lesson? 9 of swords. Will it rescue him?

Outcome: 10 of coins. Positive for him. This could, however, mean that musk is being too cheap. (FYI, musk is cheap. Example: He scrimps on his own security people by not hiring fully trained guards. Instead, he hires gym rats that look the part. Totally a trump trick and consistent with their inability to live in the real world.)

--the cards following show corruption. He throws a little money to the people. This card could also mean that people are the poorer for his gaining this spot (i.e., will cheat them out of money down the road due to his decisions.)

How does Crawford feel?
--6 of coins *****
--9 of wands?*****

Losing. She walks away

Will Schimmel show integrity?
--i.e., recusal
--World card: brings things to an end. A victory.



















Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Astrology, Spirituality & Alternative Healing»David Tarot by the Bay: M...»Reply #5