Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Does anyone here think the Nativity is not a myth? [View all]edhopper
(34,802 posts)37. consistent?
The theory is that Mark came from a earlier source and the other Gospels are based on Mark and still there are literally hundreds of incongruity, inconsistencies and flat out contradictions in the Gospels.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm just going to say that the way things are going I'd not be surprised to see a lot of babies
hlthe2b
Dec 2020
#9
But Religious Scholars point out the Magi didn't visit until 2 to 5 years later
JustFiveMoreMinutes
Dec 2020
#36
Of course not-- not any more than creation in 6 days, the Flood, or water into wine...
TreasonousBastard
Dec 2020
#22
Other issues aside, your assumptions about the Roman census may be inaccurate.
struggle4progress
Dec 2020
#30
It is more interesting to start with what we know and see where it might lead us
struggle4progress
Dec 2020
#43
Again, other issues aside, your view of a Roman massacre story may not be defensible
struggle4progress
Dec 2020
#39
The histories are histories written by and preserved by the ruling class. Rome would not care
struggle4progress
Dec 2020
#42