Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Why Democrats Struggle To Mobilize A 'Religious Left' [View all]marylandblue
(12,344 posts)7. It's perfectly understandable, though I don't believe it's justified.
Political parties are coalitions. Various parts of the coalition will always have have competing perspectives and therefore there will be friction among them.
Not justified because the coalition needs to work together, especially at the present moment. The religious left and the secular left have far more to unite them politically than disagree about. If the coalition is successful now, we could achieve a lot together. Like many successful coalitions, it may eventually come apart, but that would mean our interests have diverged so much that the coalition is no long worth it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
99 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"This emerging group of secular Democrats coexists a little uneasily with the more religious wing"
marylandblue
May 2019
#4
I don't think anyone on the religious left want a platform based on religion
marylandblue
May 2019
#30
Yes, there are people who think that, but feeding the poor is a standard progressive position.
marylandblue
May 2019
#34
"Is there any religious left leader who takes a non-progressive position because of religion?"
trotsky
May 2019
#36
I didn't say "progressive orthodoxy" was good or bad, and I'm certainly not calling myself smart.
marylandblue
May 2019
#43
I said that I MIGHT refuse to rule out restrictions until I got more details.
marylandblue
Jun 2019
#67
The fact that you would even consider restricting abortion rights is pretty repulsive.
trotsky
Jun 2019
#68
Well in terms of this thread, in general there is no such thing as a unlimited right.
marylandblue
Jun 2019
#79
OK, so you've basically just restated yourself multiple times. I don't know why.
trotsky
Jun 2019
#88
Discussion about our differing opinions. Which has been known to happen on DU from time to time.
marylandblue
Jun 2019
#91
First, don't tell me what my intentions are. Second, if I make a mistake, I admit it.
marylandblue
Jun 2019
#97
I'm not curious about why you are willing to impose restrictions on a woman's right to choose.
trotsky
Jun 2019
#98
All candidates make a bet. Buttigieg is betting more people will like his religious talk
marylandblue
May 2019
#35
No, the nones are expected to shut up and let the "religious left" do what they want.
trotsky
May 2019
#17
Religious right have a shitload of money. Nun's residence down the road from me, basically a mansion
applegrove
May 2019
#26
And chop that in about half, if you bother to read the next section about how important religion is
AtheistCrusader
Jun 2019
#95
Actually I did support it, contingent upon you actually reading the article.
AtheistCrusader
Jun 2019
#99