Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Can faith alone ever be sufficient? [View all]marylandblue
(12,344 posts)29. People are really confused about what acceptance means and what it does.
You are confusing acceptance with fatalism or passivity.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
in general, we are not rational creatures. So no reasoned argument penetrates faith.
marylandblue
Apr 2019
#4
Most can distinguish between a logical versus a very emotional argument.
Bretton Garcia
Apr 2019
#30
A lot of the needs we call rational are based in our organic nature or social matrix.
marylandblue
Apr 2019
#61
Apparently it means substituting cigarettes donuts and bad coffee for alcohol,
Voltaire2
Apr 2019
#44
You just don't like the religious origin and formulation, so I'll give you a non-religious one.
marylandblue
Apr 2019
#46
Just pointing out that the serene passivity of 12 step programs is an evidential failure
Voltaire2
Apr 2019
#49
Yep. They usually just gloss over what they don't understand. Too bad. The parables are fabulous!
Karadeniz
Apr 2019
#75
Conclusion: faith alone is never enough. We need reason, science, even more.
Bretton Garcia
Apr 2019
#58
An answer to Guil, and the alleged inevitability of faith, belief, even for rationalists
Bretton Garcia
Apr 2019
#70
Gil relies heavily on imprecise meanings of words without providing definitions
marylandblue
Apr 2019
#73