Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

DetlefK

(16,455 posts)

30. Finally someone said it. Atheism is not compatible with science:

Reply to guillaumeb (Original post)

Sat Mar 23, 2019, 07:41 PM

Mar 2019

An atheist either claims that God doesn't exist or demands proof that God exists.

It is not possible to determine via empirical evidence whether God does or doesn't exist. The scientific method is simply not capable of delivering any answer for that question because the question is outside of the mathematical and philosophical framework that the scientific method is built on. That's why atheism and science don't fit together.

God is defined as infinite, but the scientific method cannot determine whether something is infinite.
God is defined as unique, but the scientific method only works with repeatable situations.
God is defined as having free will, but the scientific method assumes that behavior is determined by fixed laws.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dartmouth physicist, known for doubting skeptics, wins 2019 Templeton Prize [View all] guillaumeb Mar 2019 OP

Pandering shit gets pandering shit prize. enki23 Mar 2019 #1

I agree with the professor!❤ Karadeniz Mar 2019 #2

About what, exactly? Mariana Mar 2019 #5

I think the professor's point is that one can't be certain of deitys nonexitence, so atheism Karadeniz Mar 2019 #20

Atheism does not require certainty. Mariana Mar 2019 #21

How many theists do you know allow for the possibility that god does not exist? Major Nikon Mar 2019 #23

I can't be CERTAIN that Zeus, Posiden, Thor, etc. DON'T exist? Really? bitterross Mar 2019 #29

Whether they understand physics.. I dunno, uriel1972 Mar 2019 #3

He sees atheism incorrectly. Perhaps some new glasses? MineralMan Mar 2019 #4

Who defines what atheists are? guillaumeb Mar 2019 #8

Certainly not you. Act_of_Reparation Mar 2019 #10

Each atheist defines it for him or herself. MineralMan Mar 2019 #11

So that shows his claim that atheists in general "believe in non-belief" is wrong muriel_volestrangler Mar 2019 #24

He is a physicist. And.... guillaumeb Mar 2019 #25

I thought the "Professor of Natural Philosophy" title refered to philosophy muriel_volestrangler Mar 2019 #28

You mean the same Templeton Foundation thas has ties to the Cato Instutute... Act_of_Reparation Mar 2019 #6

He said: guillaumeb Mar 2019 #7

Yes, he said something stupid. Act_of_Reparation Mar 2019 #9

Well, he's full of crap, then, if he said that. MineralMan Mar 2019 #12

Nice company the Templeton Foundation keeps, eh? MineralMan Mar 2019 #13

The Templeton Prize is not only bullshit edhopper Mar 2019 #14

It's telling. Act_of_Reparation Mar 2019 #15

Any port in a storm. MineralMan Mar 2019 #16

A short interview of Marcelo Gleiser by Scientific American. Jim__ Mar 2019 #17

Thank you for the link. I wil lread it later. eom guillaumeb Mar 2019 #19

... Major Nikon Mar 2019 #18

That gif is a workhorse Lordquinton Mar 2019 #22

He writes on this blog.. full text mitch96 Mar 2019 #26

I read the first page. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #27

Finally someone said it. Atheism is not compatible with science: DetlefK Mar 2019 #30

One can be a scientist, guillaumeb Mar 2019 #32

Not provable/disprovable for science, but who says it's the only way? DetlefK Mar 2019 #34

Claims about a deity can be disproven Lordquinton Mar 2019 #35

Meh Templeton Loki Liesmith Mar 2019 #31

Understood. eom guillaumeb Mar 2019 #33