Religion
In reply to the discussion: I have nothing against people who don't believe in spirituality, but people who proselytize non- [View all]zipplewrath
(16,692 posts)I've addressed these kinds of topics before. Myths like bigfoot and Nessie aren't completely falsifiable because of course they could be so rare or have other habits that tend to make them transparent. But the total lack of any verifiable evidence, combined with a huge problem with large number of documented hoaxes, definite puts them in the category of highly unlikely.
Tax Cuts for the rich is merely a problem of context. Plenty of studies upon their effects.
The conclusion that there is no way to know is because many deities fundamental description is that they are undetectable. It drives them towards the concept that they can only be "known" through faith.
You can be open to evidence, but you're setting up a criteria that violates their very description to start with. It's like saying that until I see a clear rose, I don't believe that roses exist.