Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
Mon Jan 14, 2019, 05:29 PM Jan 2019

Why religion? [View all]


From the article:

The structural-functional approach to religion has its roots in Emile Durkheim’s work on religion. Durkheim argued that religion is, in a sense, the celebration and even (self-) worship of human society. Given this approach, Durkheim proposed that religion has three major functions in society: it provides social cohesion to help maintain social solidarity through shared rituals and beliefs, social control to enforce religious-based morals and norms to help maintain conformity and control in society, and it offers meaning and purpose to answer any existential questions.



To read more:

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-sociology/chapter/the-functionalist-perspective-on-religion/

I was first introduced to Durkheim in a theology course at University. One part of reading in theology is to examine the why of things.

Why do humans self-organize into tribes, groups, nations, and other groups?


Religion, like every other aspect of tribalism, has the function of furnishing a group identity. And, like all human organizations, hat group identity can and does lead to positive and negative behaviors.

So when I read a comment in the vein of: "if only we could eradicate religion", I wonder exactly what the commenter feels is the point that is being made.
53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why religion? [View all] guillaumeb Jan 2019 OP
Associating for common goals, identity and purpose are fine; however, doing so on the basis of fairy LongtimeAZDem Jan 2019 #1
Yet people have done exactly that for thousands of years. marylandblue Jan 2019 #3
Similar to the fairy tales that are a part of US history? guillaumeb Jan 2019 #6
The vast majority of humans have been wrong and continue edhopper Jan 2019 #19
Are you ever in that vast majority? guillaumeb Jan 2019 #28
At one time edhopper Jan 2019 #37
Bill Cosby and Lance Armstrong. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #38
I also thought edhopper Jan 2019 #39
Sadly, you are correct there. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #40
Lesson learned edhopper Jan 2019 #41
Durkheim is wrong. Cartoonist Jan 2019 #2
Yes he does assume a lot, but has he been proven wrong? marylandblue Jan 2019 #4
His reputation among sociologists will not suffer too much from your opinion. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #7
He makes the same mistake you do. Cartoonist Jan 2019 #13
Have you ever considered, for even a moment, guillaumeb Jan 2019 #30
And what reputation would that be? Act_of_Reparation Jan 2019 #24
He would be happy... Act_of_Reparation Jan 2019 #21
Ha! MineralMan Jan 2019 #22
Religion is a human response ismnotwasm Jan 2019 #5
First, what is the name of the book? Thank you in advance. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #8
Tribalism doesn't necessarily mean there is an "us" and an "other" and a need for dominance marylandblue Jan 2019 #9
I was speaking predominantly of humans. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #10
You mentioned primates, there are different types of primate groups and interactions marylandblue Jan 2019 #11
THere are complicating factors, guillaumeb Jan 2019 #26
It's actually a trilogy, the first book is called "Dawn" ismnotwasm Jan 2019 #14
Altrusim is also self-interest in the same manner that group altruism guillaumeb Jan 2019 #27
That's a two part question, but Butler only answers one part. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2019 #23
You know I think about that quite a lot ismnotwasm Jan 2019 #25
It comes down to two ways of looking at what makes society work. Do we need myths to hold us Nitram Jan 2019 #12
One simple question: who said "if only we could eradicate religion"? trotsky Jan 2019 #15
Who here has said "if only we could eradicate religion?" MineralMan Jan 2019 #16
Guillaumeb using a straw man? NO WAY!! n/t trotsky Jan 2019 #17
Well, I racked my brain, briefly, and tried to think of someone MineralMan Jan 2019 #18
Reboot and try again. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #29
I almost never take instructions from you, Guy. MineralMan Jan 2019 #31
Your loss. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #32
Oddly enough, I experience no sense of loss from MineralMan Jan 2019 #33
That is where the reflection and awareness enter. eom guillaumeb Jan 2019 #34
.. MineralMan Jan 2019 #35
POST EVIDENCE OF YOUR CLAIM. trotsky Jan 2019 #36
So their is a debate on whether edhopper Jan 2019 #20
Of course there is a debate. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #43
But what does it say edhopper Jan 2019 #52
Nothing, in my view. eom guillaumeb Jan 2019 #53
STILL waiting for evidence that someone here has said "if only we could eradicate religion". trotsky Jan 2019 #42
Maybe the point is "getting rid of tribes would be good" muriel_volestrangler Jan 2019 #44
And how exactly would we eliminate the human need for family? guillaumeb Jan 2019 #45
We'd realise that the tribe is not the equivalent of a family muriel_volestrangler Jan 2019 #46
That is the goal. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #47
Requires ... letting go of institutions that demand loyalty for the sake of belonging muriel_volestrangler Jan 2019 #48
National identity offers and demands similar things. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #49
national identity is not based on supernatural promises (or threats) muriel_volestrangler Jan 2019 #50
We both respond to and create our social and physical environment. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #51
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Why religion?»Reply #0