Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Why religion? [View all]
From the article:
The structural-functional approach to religion has its roots in Emile Durkheims work on religion. Durkheim argued that religion is, in a sense, the celebration and even (self-) worship of human society. Given this approach, Durkheim proposed that religion has three major functions in society: it provides social cohesion to help maintain social solidarity through shared rituals and beliefs, social control to enforce religious-based morals and norms to help maintain conformity and control in society, and it offers meaning and purpose to answer any existential questions.
To read more:
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-sociology/chapter/the-functionalist-perspective-on-religion/
I was first introduced to Durkheim in a theology course at University. One part of reading in theology is to examine the why of things.
Why do humans self-organize into tribes, groups, nations, and other groups?
Religion, like every other aspect of tribalism, has the function of furnishing a group identity. And, like all human organizations, hat group identity can and does lead to positive and negative behaviors.
So when I read a comment in the vein of: "if only we could eradicate religion", I wonder exactly what the commenter feels is the point that is being made.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
53 replies, 5309 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Associating for common goals, identity and purpose are fine; however, doing so on the basis of fairy
LongtimeAZDem
Jan 2019
#1
His reputation among sociologists will not suffer too much from your opinion.
guillaumeb
Jan 2019
#7
Tribalism doesn't necessarily mean there is an "us" and an "other" and a need for dominance
marylandblue
Jan 2019
#9
You mentioned primates, there are different types of primate groups and interactions
marylandblue
Jan 2019
#11
It comes down to two ways of looking at what makes society work. Do we need myths to hold us
Nitram
Jan 2019
#12
STILL waiting for evidence that someone here has said "if only we could eradicate religion".
trotsky
Jan 2019
#42
Requires ... letting go of institutions that demand loyalty for the sake of belonging
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2019
#48
national identity is not based on supernatural promises (or threats)
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2019
#50