Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pope George Ringo II

(1,896 posts)
17. In all candor, this is why some of us don't view religion as harmless.
Mon Jan 14, 2019, 04:42 PM
Jan 2019

It's a big part of why I'd be quite content to see it utterly eradicated.

If that vice could be eliminated--and I'm not sure it would still be religion as we know it at that point--I'd view religion significantly more favorably.

There are some particularly--and intentionally--ill-informed people who won't see the point of #1 Pope George Ringo II Jan 2019 #1
Perhaps you missed this one? guillaumeb Jan 2019 #23
Do you think Shermer is an acceptable atheist? trotsky Jan 2019 #2
Sigh. I've made it clear I have nothing against atheism and atheists. I thought posting an example highplainsdem Jan 2019 #3
No. You've *said* you have nothing against atheism. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2019 #5
Confirming a pattern that I noted months ago. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #22
Congratulations. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2019 #55
Gotta go with the others on this one. Pope George Ringo II Jan 2019 #6
Ad hominem is one way to demonstrate superiority? guillaumeb Jan 2019 #24
Oh I understand that. trotsky Jan 2019 #7
Just what we need. A good lecturin' from a date rapist. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2019 #4
Bingo! Guess nobody noticed that part of his C. V. MineralMan Jan 2019 #46
It could be much worse. Mariana Jan 2019 #54
I don't actually remember that person. MineralMan Jan 2019 #61
#5 violetpastille Jan 2019 #8
Repeats the strawman that starts with atheists really giving a shit what someone believes Major Nikon Jan 2019 #11
Yes, that's why we're so irrational and totally the same as religious fundies. trotsky Jan 2019 #14
Atheists do care, they give it a lot of thought violetpastille Jan 2019 #18
I haven't met a single one that does Major Nikon Jan 2019 #21
By "care" do we mean "want to change" what someone believes? violetpastille Jan 2019 #30
By "believes" I mean religious belief Major Nikon Jan 2019 #36
I got that violetpastille Jan 2019 #38
Dawkins writes books that promote atheism and against religion marylandblue Jan 2019 #31
He has been quite clear on his motivation Major Nikon Jan 2019 #32
A distinction without a difference. marylandblue Jan 2019 #33
You haven't changed my belief Major Nikon Jan 2019 #35
It's not about your personal belief on every possible issue. marylandblue Jan 2019 #39
Analogy Major Nikon Jan 2019 #40
Dawkins really doesn't seem to be doing that marylandblue Jan 2019 #41
Changing their mind doesn't mean you have to change their belief Major Nikon Jan 2019 #42
I don't think there is difference between changing minds and changing beliefs marylandblue Jan 2019 #43
Or maybe the interest is exactly the same Major Nikon Jan 2019 #44
Sure, but somehow you think a religionist will "decide" that evolution is compatible with religion marylandblue Jan 2019 #48
Many do exactly that Major Nikon Jan 2019 #51
But I think we can agree there is a difference between making a persuasive argument... Act_of_Reparation Jan 2019 #56
Yes. marylandblue Jan 2019 #57
I tend to see it this way, if I'm honest. Pope George Ringo II Jan 2019 #34
A shit ton of liberals and progressives write books that promote liberalism. trotsky Jan 2019 #62
Yes that's my point, although some people object to the word "proselytize" marylandblue Jan 2019 #64
It frustrates me greatly that somehow voicing negative opinions about religion... trotsky Jan 2019 #66
I hear you, it's a hazard of being in the minority marylandblue Jan 2019 #70
From the article: guillaumeb Jan 2019 #25
Thanks for the non-sequitur Major Nikon Jan 2019 #27
Thank YOU for illustrating how humans behave as humans. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #28
You keep repeating that as if there was the least bit of sense behind it Major Nikon Jan 2019 #29
As long as we agree what "threaten(s) science and freedom." trotsky Jan 2019 #12
I agree. violetpastille Jan 2019 #16
"As long as religion does not threaten science and freedom..." Pope George Ringo II Jan 2019 #13
I agree violetpastille Jan 2019 #15
In all candor, this is why some of us don't view religion as harmless. Pope George Ringo II Jan 2019 #17
Of course it's not harmless violetpastille Jan 2019 #19
There are positives associated with religion. There really are. Pope George Ringo II Jan 2019 #20
"Atheists cannot simply define themselves by what they do not believe" Major Nikon Jan 2019 #9
That one really does give me a fit of the giggles. Pope George Ringo II Jan 2019 #10
Amazing example of becoming what one claims to hate? guillaumeb Jan 2019 #26
Why do you hate atheists? Major Nikon Jan 2019 #37
Another poster asked me the same ridiculous question a year or 2 ago. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #47
I don't believe it Major Nikon Jan 2019 #50
You have "revealed" only your opinion of me. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #69
Actually it's a fact that I don't believe you Major Nikon Jan 2019 #71
But you are responding to the other posters in the same exact way. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #72
I didn't say that about any other poster Major Nikon Jan 2019 #73
Yes, the "evidence" claim. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #74
It's familiar because that's exactly your game Major Nikon Jan 2019 #75
You do sound as if you are convinced. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #76
More evidence of diversion Major Nikon Jan 2019 #77
Do you mean your avoidance of the question? guillaumeb Jan 2019 #78
I feel no obligation to answer irrelevant questions Major Nikon Jan 2019 #79
The words "irrelevant" and "uncomfortable" are not synonymous. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #80
You seem to be uncomfortable discussing the topic Major Nikon Jan 2019 #82
One of us is. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #83
More diversion Major Nikon Jan 2019 #84
Amazingly enough, I waas thinking the same thing. eom guillaumeb Jan 2019 #85
Funny you should say that Major Nikon Jan 2019 #86
That type of leading question is on a level with the ever popular.. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #87
Since when has that ever mattered to you? Major Nikon Jan 2019 #88
The choir is a metaphor, guillaumeb Jan 2019 #89
Yeah, the one you use to dehumanize those you assign to it Major Nikon Jan 2019 #90
Your "explanation" of my goal is noted. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #91
As is yours Major Nikon Jan 2019 #92
So my behavior preceded my posting here? guillaumeb Jan 2019 #93
No Major Nikon Jan 2019 #94
Dude doesn't represent me. MineralMan Jan 2019 #45
That's a deal-breaker for a guy who didn't need any deal breakers. Pope George Ringo II Jan 2019 #49
There are a few "professional" atheists around. MineralMan Jan 2019 #59
Dawkins doesn't speak for me either Major Nikon Jan 2019 #52
Anyone who pretends to be a spokesperson for atheism is a fraud. MineralMan Jan 2019 #58
Well, I've heard atheists themselves refer to a movement marylandblue Jan 2019 #81
It's a symptom of religious privilege. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2019 #60
I am so sick and tired of the term "atheist" trixie2 Jan 2019 #53
In that, you are like most non-believers. MineralMan Jan 2019 #63
Language is a system for labeling things marylandblue Jan 2019 #65
I would hope we moved past labels trixie2 Jan 2019 #67
So don't use the word atheist. Mariana Jan 2019 #68
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Michael Shermer, Scientif...»Reply #17