I have nothing against people who don't believe in spirituality, but people who proselytize non-

[NeoGreen]

21. Considering the source...

...

Lauren Sandler is the author of Righteous: Dispatches from the Evangelical Youth Movement. She has contributed journalism and opinion about culture, politics, and religion for many publications, including The Atlantic, The New Republic, Slate, The Nation, Mother Jones, and The New York Times.

The article is nothing more than a lament for the feeling you get when your priviledge is being eroded, i.e.:

When You’re Accustomed to Privilege, Equality Feels Like Oppression’

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-boeskool/when-youre-accustomed-to-privilege_b_9460662.html

As highlighted in this passage:

While Dawkins can see a political case to be made for the tolerant-humanist approach, he says that it is his writing—along with colleagues Hitchens and Sam Harris—and not the kinder, gentler voices of atheism, that is actually effecting change, and public relations be damned. Plus, he says, his work is hardly radical—it's only perceived as extremist because of the relative silence of people who question that faith is truth. “I think the illusion of stridency—you almost can’t use the word 'atheism' without preceding it with 'strident'—comes from the long period where it simply wasn't done to criticize religions.”

The only ones calling us "strident" are the religious.

Atheists aren't going door to door, they are not the ones advocating laws in deference to bronze age theology, they don't create target lists of who to kill:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnett_Slepian
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_terrorism#United_States
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_of_God_(United_States)