Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
What does the RCC say about the Great Flood described in the Bible? [View all]
From the article:
The Catholic Church does not prohibit interpretations of Genesis 6-8 that include a worldwide flood, but neither does the Church require there to be a worldwide flood in all interpretations of these passages. Instead, Catholic theologians understand the first eleven chapters of Genesis contain, in the words of Pope Pius XII, simple and metaphorical language adapted to the mentality of a people but little cultured, both state the principal truths which are fundamental for our salvation, and also give a popular description of the origin of the human race and the chosen people (Humani Generis, 38).
Modern readers may interpret passages in Genesis that describe water covering the earth as meaning that the entire planet was inundated. But a resident of ancient Mesopotamia may have understood the the earth to mean only the land or the region he knew. In fact, the Hebrew word for earth used in this passage, eretz, can also mean land, as in Genesis 41:57, where it says that all the eretz came to Egypt to buy grain when a famine struck the region. This doesnt mean that everyone on the planet went to Egypt to buy grain, just those people who inhabited the region to which the author was referring.
Modern readers may interpret passages in Genesis that describe water covering the earth as meaning that the entire planet was inundated. But a resident of ancient Mesopotamia may have understood the the earth to mean only the land or the region he knew. In fact, the Hebrew word for earth used in this passage, eretz, can also mean land, as in Genesis 41:57, where it says that all the eretz came to Egypt to buy grain when a famine struck the region. This doesnt mean that everyone on the planet went to Egypt to buy grain, just those people who inhabited the region to which the author was referring.
To read more:
https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/a-catholic-perspective-on-a-new-attraction
And there is also this, from the Catholic Bishops:
How should modern readers interpret the creation-flood story in Gn 211? The stories are neither history nor myth. Myth is an unsuitable term, for it has several different meanings and connotes untruth in popular English. History is equally misleading, for it suggests that the events actually took place. The best term is creation-flood story. Ancient Near Eastern thinkers did not have our methods of exploring serious questions. Instead, they used narratives for issues that we would call philosophical and theological. They added and subtracted narrative details and varied the plot as they sought meaning in the ancient stories. Their stories reveal a privileged time, when divine decisions were made that determined the future of the human race. The origin of something was thought to explain its present meaning, e.g., how God acts with justice and generosity, why human beings are rebellious, the nature of sexual attraction and marriage, why there are many peoples and languages. Though the stories may initially strike us as primitive and naive, they are in fact told with skill, compression, and subtlety. They provide profound answers to perennial questions about God and human beings.
To read more:
http://www.usccb.org/bible/genesis/0
Basically, a Catholic is free to read the story as literal or metaphoric, or a combination of both.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
65 replies, 5191 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What does the RCC say about the Great Flood described in the Bible? [View all]
guillaumeb
Dec 2018
OP
The alleged real Jesus also differs with your alleged metaphorical real version of the flood myth
Major Nikon
Dec 2018
#64
There's difficulty in being able to see scripture taken in a literal AND
sprinkleeninow
Dec 2018
#22
And the names make it clear to me clear that it is about life coming from the earth.
guillaumeb
Dec 2018
#40
I would go with "myth" even though it is often associated with "not true" in English.
gtar100
Dec 2018
#25
Maybe you called the Matthew Shepard case bullshit, but I called it murder.
marylandblue
Dec 2018
#46
The incredibly harsh world they actually lived in and a little bit of hope
marylandblue
Dec 2018
#41
Sure. I understand how Genesis fits religions. But in the OP you ask about the RCC.
Cuthbert Allgood
Dec 2018
#61