Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(147,885 posts)
8. What they bring is change. Whether that is beneficial or harmful
Wed Nov 28, 2018, 12:12 PM
Nov 2018

depends on whether change is desired or needed. In most cases, the existing culture and religion were doing OK. The missionaries and their hangers-on bring trinkets, new diseases, and an alien religion with them. All too often, the disruption caused by those new things ends up destroying the existing culture over time.

In sum, typically it is a negative exchange. When the Spanish Catholics came to the Americas, it only took a couple hundred years for the existing cultures to be completely wiped out. They brought soldiers with them, enslaved the indigenous peoples, converted them to Christianity by force, changed their diets, their way of life, gave them European diseases, and then discarded those peoples.

The same things happened almost everywhere Christianity came through missionaries. The missionaries were the first intruders, but were followed by the exploiters, who quickly forced the indigenous people to give them whatever natural resources they had. Slavery, murder, genocide, and displacement were the rewards for those people.

So, I can't see any benefit to missionaries, really. Their promises were false, but their exploitation of indigenous peoples were very effective, typically wiping out entire cultures and so allowing their fellow countrymen to come in and steal their lands.

Ugly crap all around.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Those missionaries bring disease as well as "the Bible" dawg day Nov 2018 #1
harm. handmade34 Nov 2018 #2
Why are we even having this discussion? Act_of_Reparation Nov 2018 #3
The arrogance, the hubris, the presumption is amazing isn't it. Thomas Hurt Nov 2018 #4
The case of Chau is an excellent example of boundless stupidity of missionary work Major Nikon Nov 2018 #5
Harm. RockRaven Nov 2018 #6
Harm. Missionaries have a sense of religious entitlement from the get-go pandr32 Nov 2018 #7
What they bring is change. Whether that is beneficial or harmful MineralMan Nov 2018 #8
... Major Nikon Nov 2018 #10
Exactly. They promise to save your soul. MineralMan Nov 2018 #11
Proselytizing is presumptuous and arrogant. 3catwoman3 Nov 2018 #9
Can they not do both? guillaumeb Nov 2018 #12
Please provide examples of good results. MineralMan Nov 2018 #13
You are welcome... guillaumeb Nov 2018 #14
I see. I did provide examples from history. MineralMan Nov 2018 #15
You mean like the history of the US? Major Nikon Nov 2018 #16
Perhaps Guy is not familiar with history. MineralMan Nov 2018 #19
As are you. Act_of_Reparation Nov 2018 #17
Too much bother, I expect. MineralMan Nov 2018 #18
Shouldn't be too difficult. Act_of_Reparation Nov 2018 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»John Allen Chau: Do missi...»Reply #8