Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: When an initial premise has no supporting evidence, [View all]guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)42. Here is your entire response:
Response to trotsky (Reply #5)
Sat Sep 15, 2018, 10:47 AM
Voltaire2 (3,979 posts)
23. Fuck this. Fine I believe the stunning lack of
any evidence that your gods exist to be highly convincing. In all likelihood your gods do not exist.
You sir, on the other hand, appear to view the same complete lack of evidence for the existence of your loathsome gods to be a confirmation of their existence.
Sat Sep 15, 2018, 10:47 AM
Voltaire2 (3,979 posts)
23. Fuck this. Fine I believe the stunning lack of
any evidence that your gods exist to be highly convincing. In all likelihood your gods do not exist.
You sir, on the other hand, appear to view the same complete lack of evidence for the existence of your loathsome gods to be a confirmation of their existence.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations