Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
38. Some think their positions don't REQUIRE supporting evidence.
Tue Sep 18, 2018, 12:58 PM
Sep 2018

It's like a Get Out Jail Free card for terrible ideas.

So, when a person believes that there is no deity, based solely guillaumeb Sep 2018 #1
Misframing. trotsky Sep 2018 #2
Avoidance. guillaumeb Sep 2018 #3
Hell yeah I'm going to "avoid" it because it's a straw man argument. It's not my position. trotsky Sep 2018 #5
Yes, your position. guillaumeb Sep 2018 #6
No, it's not. trotsky Sep 2018 #7
Okay. I understand now. eom guillaumeb Sep 2018 #8
Great. Glad to hear you won't be putting forth that phony position anymore. n/t trotsky Sep 2018 #9
good job! rurallib Sep 2018 #27
Fuck this. Fine I believe the stunning lack of Voltaire2 Sep 2018 #23
Thank you. guillaumeb Sep 2018 #24
He was replying to you. trotsky Sep 2018 #30
Read the thread. guillaumeb Sep 2018 #31
Yet another example of confirmation bias. Voltaire2 Sep 2018 #33
Read the thread, INDEED. trotsky Sep 2018 #35
Your reply is a classic. guillaumeb Sep 2018 #37
Read. The. Post. trotsky Sep 2018 #40
I was commenting on your post Gil. Voltaire2 Sep 2018 #41
Here is your entire response: guillaumeb Sep 2018 #42
Very good. That is my comment on your post. Voltaire2 Sep 2018 #44
trotsky thought otherwise. As indicated here: guillaumeb Sep 2018 #45
Very good. Yet more confirmation bias. Voltaire2 Sep 2018 #46
He was replying to you, gil. trotsky Sep 2018 #47
I can only assume that you did not read my response. guillaumeb Sep 2018 #50
I've explained this already. trotsky Sep 2018 #52
He never admitted to an error. guillaumeb Sep 2018 #53
The post again: trotsky Sep 2018 #54
Do you understand the difference between guillaumeb Sep 2018 #55
Alright, we'll keep your humiliation going. trotsky Sep 2018 #56
No. An atheist believes nothing with regard to deities. MineralMan Sep 2018 #11
Your first and second sentences contradict each other. guillaumeb Sep 2018 #13
No, sir, they do not contradict each other. MineralMan Sep 2018 #14
It's pure weasel words Lordquinton Sep 2018 #28
I love the smell of Intellectual Dishonesty in the morning... uriel1972 Sep 2018 #49
Absence of belief is the polar opposite of belief Major Nikon Sep 2018 #34
Of course. guillaumeb Sep 2018 #36
I accept you offer nothing more than canned responses Major Nikon Sep 2018 #43
No edhopper Sep 2018 #19
It serves a purpose, I guess. Claiming that atheism is a belief MineralMan Sep 2018 #20
The word "believe" should be banished from the English language marylandblue Sep 2018 #21
I believe edhopper Sep 2018 #22
I just posted a whole thing about this Lordquinton Sep 2018 #29
No Major Nikon Sep 2018 #32
Why would anyone state that as a premise? MineralMan Sep 2018 #10
There is a difference between a scientific mind and a non-scientific mind marylandblue Sep 2018 #16
Yes, but reality is reality and truth is truth. MineralMan Sep 2018 #17
Yes, believing without evidence is a bad guide to reality marylandblue Sep 2018 #18
Truth ends up, outside of closed sets and meta Voltaire2 Sep 2018 #25
Reality is Reality sure... uriel1972 Sep 2018 #48
Reality is qazplm135 Sep 2018 #51
Perception is not reality. Voltaire2 Sep 2018 #57
The best answer is qazplm135 Sep 2018 #58
Hitchen's razor exboyfil Sep 2018 #4
Thank you for that quote and link. MineralMan Sep 2018 #12
Great post.. Permanut Sep 2018 #15
I've always felt that Bill Maher says it best PJMcK Sep 2018 #26
Some think their positions don't REQUIRE supporting evidence. Act_of_Reparation Sep 2018 #38
Well, that is most certainly true. MineralMan Sep 2018 #39
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»When an initial premise h...»Reply #38